Evaluating Technical Communication Faculty: Some Empirically-Based Criteria and Guidelines

Dwight W. Stevenson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Abstract

To evaluate Technical Communication faculty requires understanding of the distinctive nature of the research, teaching, and service performed by faculty in the field. This article documents the work situations and accomplishments of a cadre of twenty-four accomplished faculty members in Technical Communication. The study group, identified by a prior survey of 275 people in technical writing, composition, and rhetoric, provides an empirical basis for defining the kinds and quantities of work that currently can be expected in the field. The article thus helps to provide empirically-based guidelines and criteria for evaluation. Included also is a discussion of other relevant research on faculty evaluation.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1986-01-01
DOI
10.2190/p7yy-br2f-g4c0-mnfy
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (13)

  1. Determining Faculty Effectiveness: Assessing Teaching Research, and Service for Personnel…
  2. 10.1037/e465412008-065
  3. Journal of Higher Education
  4. 10.1126/science.160.3824.164
  5. American Sociologist
Show all 13 →
  1. 10.1080/00221546.1975.11780630
  2. 10.1007/BF00136452
  3. Cables/Cableways Instructional Design Series
  4. Review of Interactive Writing: Composing with a Word Processor, Technical Communication, in press.
  5. Cables/Cableways Instructional Design Series
  6. A Beginner's Guide to Teaching Technical Writing: An Annotated Bibliography, (with Bill Birns), ERIC ED 245 2…
  7. Review of Business and Technical Writing Cookbook, Technical Communication, 30, No. 3, 1983.
  8. Paper presented at the Southeastern Conference on English in the Two-Year College