Cognitive Processes and Technical Writing: Developmental Foundations

Abstract

A brief overview of methods relating language education to psychological theories and models is provided. Strengths and weaknesses of behaviorist and mentalist approaches are surveyed, followed by an outline of a recently developing cognitive-process approach. The approach is then illustrated with an individual case study from the University of Florida writing program, with special consideration of the concerns of technical writing on the topic of automobile repair instructions. It is argued that specific tendencies carry over from speech habits that are partly supportive and partly contrary to success in learning the skills of technical writing. Consequently, appropriate training should be able to alleviate the contrary tendencies, provided we take into account the operations of writing.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1982-04-01
DOI
10.2190/f7pk-4ku1-prvy-vrv9
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Written Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College English
Also cites 26 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1037/h0062737
  2. 10.1037/11256-000
  3. 10.2307/411334
  4. 10.1037/h0047800
  5. 10.1037/h0044708
  6. 10.1080/17470216408416385
  7. 10.3758/BF03211044
  8. Language and Acceptability
  9. 10.1515/flin.1969.3.3-4.178
  10. 10.1515/9783111657158
  11. 10.2307/374179
  12. 10.2307/355051
  13. 10.2307/812671
  14. What Writers Know: Studies in the Psychology of Language
  15. 10.1207/s15516709cog0301_3
  16. 10.1016/0010-0285(71)90020-X
  17. 10.1126/science.189.4198.226
  18. 10.1037/h0027461
  19. 10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80028-9
  20. 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90004-3
  21. 10.2307/747559
  22. 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
  23. 10.3758/BF03198229
  24. 10.1177/002383097201500201
  25. 10.1007/BF00424616
  26. 10.3758/BF03205750
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →