Coherent Deformation in Scientific and Technical Writing

Dennis E. Minor Louisiana Tech University

Abstract

The fact that some ideas seem to be inexpressible directly in language and that the induction-hypothesis sequence in scientific thinking does not completely account for new ideas may be due to the peculiar abilities of the right and left hemispheres of the brain. Study of the mind and philosophers of perception suggest that perception and imagination or fact and intuition are combined in language, which then takes on new meaning through “coherent deformation” and leads to new thinking. This new thinking then can best be replicated in the reader through nondirect means such as metaphors and visual materials.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1980-07-01
DOI
10.2190/rm98-enql-58dr-vef9
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (20)

  1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-484050-8.50012-1
  2. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1972.tb01788.x
  3. Reporting Technical Information
  4. The Art of the Soluble
  5. Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought
Show all 20 →
  1. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
  2. The Primacy of Perception
  3. The Tacit Dimension
  4. Speaking and Meaning
  5. Signs
  6. Signs
  7. Perception and Its Disorders
  8. The Science of Art
  9. 10.7591/9781501741326
  10. Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science
  11. The Primacy of Perception
  12. The Primacy of Perception
  13. The Technical Writing Teacher
  14. The Technical Writing Teacher
  15. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication