Credibility and Reasoning in Technical Writing—Some Notes for Writers, Editors, and Instructors

Michael P. Jordan Queen's University

Abstract

Information, commands, and requirements not only must be understood—they must be credible too. That is, they must be such that they change the knowledge or understanding of the readers, or else they demand appropriate action. These introductory notes explain under what circumstance statements need to be made more credible and they explain how to add credibility at the clause, sentence, paragraph, and section levels. Principles of syllogistic reasoning, analogies, and experimental reasoning are also discussed. Brief mention is made of the related instruction for students and professional engineers.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1976-01-01
DOI
10.2190/fpx3-dfeh-r2pm-6mke
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (6) · 1 in this index

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Jordan M., Technical Report Writing—A Survey of Some Recent Advances, ASEE paper, Annual Conference St. Lawre…
  3. Toulmin P., The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–146, 1964.
  4. Jordan M., Performance Specifying, Canadian Consulting Engineer, June 1974.
  5. Brody B., Logic—Theoretical and Applied, Prentice Hall, pp. 229–236, 1973.
Show all 6 →
  1. U. S. Ordnance Corps Pamphlet ORDP 20-2, Guide to Technical Evaluation of Research and Development Proposals,…