Abstract

ABSTRACT Why does post-truth discourse feel true? This article argues that post-truth fears the death of rhetoric, rather than truth, and traces that fear to the voluminous, rapid, and intense production of stasis on social media. Social media enable and weaponize the production of stasis, and that production generates affects more aligned with death than life (stagnation, hopelessness) that explain why post-truth feels true. These fears and their concomitant hopes constitute an affective economy also present in philosophy’s predominant images of rhetoric. Some images picture rhetoric as movement, whereas others emphasize rhetoric’s capacity to secure the status quo. Social media beckon a supplementary image—a vortex—in which rhetorical movement functions to produce standstill. This image suggests the need to consider affects generated by rhetorical processes as much as from texts. Post-truth’s affective economy also drives stasis production generally, and scholars should attend to the affective economies driving various rhetorical modes.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2024-09-24
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.57.2.0166
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (14)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric
Show all 14 →
  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  6. Rhetoric Review
  7. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  8. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  9. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. “Rhetoric and Capitalism: Rhetorical Agency as Communicative Labor.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric  
  2. “Post-Truth: A Guide for the Perplexed.”
    Nature  
  3. “Commitment to Telos: A Sustained Critical Rhetoric.”
    Communication Monographs  
  4. “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.”
    Critical Studies in Media Communication  
  5. Networked Affect
  6. “Spaces of Invention: Dissension, Freedom, and Thought in Foucault.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric  
  7. “To Make a Desert and Call It Peace: Stasis and Judgment in the MX Missile Debate.”
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  8. “Capitalizing on the Look: Insights into the Glance, Attention, Economy, and Instagram.”
    Critical Studies in Media Communication  
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →