Abstract

ABSTRACT With higher education in a state of flux, it’s time to more clearly understand what flux—mobility—means for the work of faculty at colleges and universities. With threats to shared governance, tenure, and academic freedom representing one sort of change, what would it mean for faculty to lean into the vulnerability that they are experiencing? Mobility has consequences: one of them is the risk of harm; another is the potential to destabilize concepts and entities. This article is an argument for faculty to lean into vulnerability, with all of the consequences attached to it, in order to change the trajectory of higher education in an era of flux, but recognizing that doing so will require courage and new forms of solidarity.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2024-06-28
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.57.1.0112
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (14) · 2 in this index

  1. Willful Subjects
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. The Vulnerability of Public Higher Education
  5. Challenging Knowledge: The University in the Knowledge Society
Show all 14 →
  1. “Of Violence and Rhetoric: An Ethical Aporia.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  2. The Undercommons: Fugitive Planning & Black Study
  3. Logos and Power in Isocrates and Aristotle
  4. The Uses of the University
  5. “Precarity Talk: A Virtual Roundtable with Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Bojana Cvejic, …
    TDR: The Drama Review  
  6. Stormer, Nathan. 2015. “Everything Moves, Even When It Doesn’t.”Paper, University of South Carolina…
  7. The Emergence of the American University
  8. “Stochastic Citizenship: Toward a Rhetoric of Mobility.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  9. Politics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism