Abstract

ABSTRACT In order to explore the possibilities of affirmative ethics and algorithmic judgment, this article puts machinic rhetoric in conversation with classical imitation pedagogy. Taking a machine-learning chatbot as my example, I examine how imitation and repetition in a restrictive economy of rhetorical models produces a limited affirmative ethics through dialectical relations. Drawing on Hannah Arendt's concept of representative thinking to theorize a procedure for algorithmic judgment, I argue that rhetorical training requires the affirmation of a plurality of models if it is to generate not only versatility but also ethical repetitions.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2021-12-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.54.4.0348
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric
Show all 6 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. “Semantics Derived Automatically from Language Corpora Contain Human-Like Biases.”
    Science  
  2. “Machinic Rhetorics and the Influential Movements of Robots.”
    Review of Communication  
  3. “The Ugly Truth about Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social I…
    Science and Engineering Ethics  
  4. “On Rhetoric as Gift/Giving.”
    Philosophy & Rhetoric  
  5. “The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement.”
    Critical Studies in Communication  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →