The Machine That Therefore I Am

Abstract

AbstractFollowing Derrida, who follows the animal, this article seeks to proliferate the figures that mark the limits of the space between the “machine” and the “human.” Drawing on Erasmus's De copia, I argue that rhetoricians have long been interested in robot-like procedures. Given these machinic roots, we can understand a rhetorical education as procedural and computational and as particularly well suited to a cultural moment in which we write with (alongside) machines. In addition, I describe a robot that enacts Erasmus's method of continually rewriting the sentence “Your letter pleased me greatly.” The article thus demonstrates two ways of addressing the robot rhetor. First, it suggests that a rereading of the machinic tradition within rhetoric opens up new ways of understanding all rhetorical action as robotic. Second, echoing Ian Bogost, it demonstrates how works of “carpentry” can offer a window (albeit, a cloudy one) onto extrahuman rhetorical relations.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2014-11-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.47.4.0494
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bender, John B., and David E. Wellbery. 1990. The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. Stanford, CA: …
  2. Bogost, Ian. 2007. Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Bogost, Ian. 2012. Alien Phenomenology; or, What It's Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesot…
  4. Bryant, Levi R. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.
  5. Bryant, Levi R. 2014b. Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  6. Van Noorden, Richard. 2014. “Publishers Withdraw More Than 120 Gibberish Papers.” Nature, Feb., doi:10.1038/n…
CrossRef global citation count: 14 View in citation network →