Abstract

Abstract Jacques Rancière defines literarity as texts' propensity to be used in unexpected ways by unforeseen readers. Unlike scholars who view literarity as having intrinsically democratic implications, I contend that Rancière offers a more ambivalent account of its significance. I illustrate my argument by analyzing the aftermath of suffragists' appeal to the U.S. Constitution in the 1870s. I show that public agitation over textual meaning can shore up the perception that a text is indeterminate and allows debate, but it can be cited as well as a symptom of incompetence and duplicity, as evidence that texts should be reserved for those with mastery. Using a text democratically, then, involves more than advocating for innovative interpretations. It also involves struggling for the propriety of treating the meaning of a text as a matter of democratic interaction, against those who treat it as not subject to public debate.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2016-11-21
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.49.4.0500
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Chambers, Samuel. 2013. The Lessons of Rancière. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Deranty, Jean-Philippe. 2014. “Regime of the Arts.” In Jacques Rancière: Key Concepts, ed. Jean-Philippe Dera…
  4. Douzinas, Costas. 2000. The End of Human Rights. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
  5. Gündogdu, Ayten. 2012. “A Revolution in Rights: Reflections on the Democratic Invention of the Rights of Man.…
  6. Lash, Kurt. 2014. The Fourteenth Amendment and the Privileges and Immunities of American Citizenship. Cambrid…
  7. Pasquier, Renaud. 2004. “Politiques de la lecture.” Labyrinthe 17 (1): 33–63.
  8. Rancière, Jacques. 2008a. “Aesthetics Against Incarnation: An Interview by Anne Marie Oliver.” Critical Inqui…
  9. Rancière, Jacques. 2008b. “From Politics to Aesthetics?” Paragraph 28 (1): 13–25.
  10. Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Ed. and trans. Steven Corcoran. London: Continuum.
  11. Rancière Jacques, and Davide Panagia. 2000. “Dissenting Words: A Conversation with Jacques Rancière.” Diactri…
  12. Ray, Angela. 2007. “The Rhetorical Ritual of Citizenship: Women's Voting as Public Performance, 1868–1875.” Q…
  13. Robson, Mark. 2009. “‘A Literary Animal:’ Rancière, Derrida, and the Literature of Democracy.” Parallax 15 (3…
  14. Ross, Alison. 2014. “Expressivity, Literarity, Mute Speech.” In Jacques Rancière: Key Concepts, ed. Jean-Phil…
  15. Tribe, Laurence. 1995. “Taking Text and Structure Seriously.” Harvard Law Review 108 (6): 1221–1303.
  16. Zerilli, Linda. 2012. “Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment: Farewell to Public Reason.” Political The…
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →