Abstract

Abstract Jacques Rancière defines literarity as texts' propensity to be used in unexpected ways by unforeseen readers. Unlike scholars who view literarity as having intrinsically democratic implications, I contend that Rancière offers a more ambivalent account of its significance. I illustrate my argument by analyzing the aftermath of suffragists' appeal to the U.S. Constitution in the 1870s. I show that public agitation over textual meaning can shore up the perception that a text is indeterminate and allows debate, but it can be cited as well as a symptom of incompetence and duplicity, as evidence that texts should be reserved for those with mastery. Using a text democratically, then, involves more than advocating for innovative interpretations. It also involves struggling for the propriety of treating the meaning of a text as a matter of democratic interaction, against those who treat it as not subject to public debate.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2016-11-21
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.49.4.0500
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (52)

  1. Althusser, Louis, and Etienne Balibar. 1970. Reading Capital. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: New Left Books.
  2. Basch, Norma. 1992. “Reconstructing Female Citizenship: Minor v. Happersett.” In The Constitution, Law, and A…
  3. Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Chambers, Samuel. 2013. The Lessons of Rancière. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Davis, Oliver. 2010. Jacques Rancière. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Show all 52 →
  1. Davis, Oliver. 2013. “The Politics of Art: Aesthetic Contingency and the Aesthetic Affect.” In Rancière Now, …
  2. Deranty, Jean-Philippe. 2014. “Regime of the Arts.” In Jacques Rancière: Key Concepts, ed. Jean-Philippe Dera…
  3. Douglass, Frederick. 1999. Selected Speeches and Writings. Ed. Philip S. Foner. Chicago: Lawrence Hill Books.
  4. Douzinas, Costas. 2000. The End of Human Rights. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
  5. DuBois, Ellen. 1978. Feminism and Suffrage. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  6. DuBois, Ellen. 1995. “Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Bradwell, Minor, and Suffrage Militance in the 1870s…
  7. Guillois, Alfred. 1904. Etude médico-psychologique sur Olympe de Gouges. Lyon: A. Rey.
  8. Gündogdu, Ayten. 2012. “A Revolution in Rights: Reflections on the Democratic Invention of the Rights of Man.…
  9. Hamilton, Neil. 2002. American Social Leaders and Activists. New York: Facts on File.
  10. Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  11. Kerber, Linda. 1995. “‘Ourselves and Our Daughters Forever:’ Women and the Constitution, 1787–1876.” In One W…
  12. Lane, Jeremy. 2013. “Rancière's Anti-Platonism: Equality, the ‘Orphan Letter,’ and the Problematic of the Soc…
  13. Lash, Kurt. 2014. The Fourteenth Amendment and the Privileges and Immunities of American Citizenship. Cambrid…
  14. Lefort, Claude. 1986. Essais sur la politique. Paris: Seuil.
  15. Lefort, Claude. 1988. The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. Cambrid…
  16. Moore, Wayne. 1996. Constitutional Rights and the Powers of the People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  17. Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
  18. Pasquier, Renaud. 2004. “Politiques de la lecture.” Labyrinthe 17 (1): 33–63.
  19. Plato. 1991. The Republic. Trans. Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books.
  20. Rancière, Jacques. 1994. The Names of History: On the Politics of Knowledge. Trans. Hassan Melehy. Minneapoli…
  21. Rancière, Jacques. 1996. “Le concept d'anachronisme et la vérité de l'historien.” L'Inactuel 6: 53–68.
  22. Rancière, Jacques. 1998. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Trans. Julie Rose. Minneapolis: University of…
  23. Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Flesh of Words: The Politics of Writing. Trans. Charlotte Mandell. Stanford, CA:…
  24. Rancière, Jacques. 2006a. On the Shores of Politics. Trans. Liz Heron. London: Verso.
  25. Rancière, Jacques. 2006b. The Politics of Aesthetic. Trans. Gabriel Rockhill. London: Continuum.
  26. Rancière, Jacques. 2008a. “Aesthetics Against Incarnation: An Interview by Anne Marie Oliver.” Critical Inqui…
  27. Rancière, Jacques. 2008b. “From Politics to Aesthetics?” Paragraph 28 (1): 13–25.
  28. Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Ed. and trans. Steven Corcoran. London: Continuum.
  29. Rancière, Jacques. 2011a. “Against the Ebbing Tide.” In Reading Rancière: Critical Dissensus, ed. Paul Bowman…
  30. Rancière, Jacques. 2011b. Mute Speech: Literature, Critical Theory, and Politics. Trans. James Swenson. New Y…
  31. Rancière, Jacques. 2011c. Politics of Literature. Trans. Julie Rose. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  32. Rancière, Jacques. 2012a. La méthode de l'égalité. Paris: Bayard.
  33. Rancière, Jacques. 2012b. “A Politics of Aesthetic Indetermination: An Interview with Frank Ruda and Jan Voek…
  34. Rancière, Jacques. 2012c. Proletarian Nights. Trans. John Drury. London: Verso.
  35. Rancière Jacques, and Davide Panagia. 2000. “Dissenting Words: A Conversation with Jacques Rancière.” Diactri…
  36. Ray, Angela. 2007. “The Rhetorical Ritual of Citizenship: Women's Voting as Public Performance, 1868–1875.” Q…
  37. Richards, Cindy Koenig. 2007. “Susan B. Anthony, ‘Is It a Crime for a U.S. Citizen to Vote?’” Voices of Democ…
  38. Robson, Mark. 2009. “‘A Literary Animal:’ Rancière, Derrida, and the Literature of Democracy.” Parallax 15 (3…
  39. Ross, Alison. 2012. “Equality in the Romantic Art Form: The Hegelian Background to Jacques Rancière's ‘Aesthe…
  40. Ross, Alison. 2014. “Expressivity, Literarity, Mute Speech.” In Jacques Rancière: Key Concepts, ed. Jean-Phil…
  41. Stanton, Elizabeth Cady, Susan B. Anthony, and Matilda Gage, eds. 1881. History of Woman Suffrage, vol. 2. Ro…
  42. Stanton, Elizabeth Cady, Susan B. Anthony, and Matilda Gage, eds. 1886. History of Woman Suffrage, vol. 3. Ro…
  43. Strauss, Leo. 1988. What Is Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  44. Tribe, Laurence. 1995. “Taking Text and Structure Seriously.” Harvard Law Review 108 (6): 1221–1303.
  45. U.S. Supreme Court. 1947. Adamson v. California. 332 U.S. 46.
  46. Winkler, Adam. 2001. “A Revolution Too Soon: Women Suffragists and the ‘Living Constitution.’” New York Unive…
  47. Zerilli, Linda. 2012. “Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment: Farewell to Public Reason.” Political The…