Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2010 Rhetorical Circulation in Late Capitalism:Neoliberalism and the Overdetermination of Affective Energy Catherine Chaput Catherine Chaput Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2010) 43 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0001 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Catherine Chaput; Rhetorical Circulation in Late Capitalism:Neoliberalism and the Overdetermination of Affective Energy. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2010; 43 (1): 1–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0001 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2010 The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2010The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.43.1.0001
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (12)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 12 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
  6. Computers and Composition
  7. Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Poroi
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. Andrejevic, Mark, and James Hay. 2006. “Introduction: Homeland (In)Securities.” Cultural Studies 20 (4–5): 331–48.
  2. Brown, Wendy. 2003. “Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy.” Theory & Event 7 (1): 1–21.
  3. Greene, Ronald Walter. 2004. “Rhetoric and Capitalism: Rhetorical Agency as Communicative Labor.” Philosophy …
  4. Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Hirschman, Albert O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triu…
  6. Hunsaker, David M., and Craig R. Smith. 1976. “The Nature of Issues: A Constructive Approach to Situational R…
  7. Massumi, Brian. 2002b. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  8. Parker, Jeremy. 2007. “Homeland Subjectivity: The Algorithmic Identity of Security.” Communication and Critic…
  9. Patton, John H. 1979. “Causation and Creativity in Rhetorical Situations: Distinctions and Implications.” Qua…
  10. Richert, Thomas. 2007. “Toward the Chōra: Kristeva, Derrida, and Ulmer on Emplaced Invention.” Philosophy and…
  11. Smith, Craig R., and Scott Lybarger. 1996. “Bitzer's Model Reconstructed.” Communication Quarterly 44 (2): 197–213.
  12. Vatz, Richard E. 2009. “The Mythical Status of Situational Rhetoric: Implications for Rhetorical Critics' Rel…
  13. Vivian, Bradford. 2006. “Neoliberal Epideictic: Rhetorical Form and Commemorative Politics on September 11, 2…
CrossRef global citation count: 43 View in citation network →