Abstract
Peer review is a common practice in writing studies. However, while there is considerable research on peer review, pedagogical studies on other forms of student-led assessment strategies are less prevalent. This study investigates the expansion of assessment practices into student-led rubric development and peer grading, focusing on their effect on student understanding of the writing process. Utilizing surveys and classroom observations in two second-year composition courses at a university in New York City, this study investigates student-led assessment strategies as a potent pedagogical tool, adding to literature that explores assessment as an active part of the writing process.
- Journal
- Journal of Response to Writing
- Published
- 2020-01-01
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for Journal of Response to Writing. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
Written Communication May 2026Beyond Co-Regulation: Interplay as a Methodological Framework for Examining Self-Regulation in Generative AI-Assisted Writing ↗Ryan Roderick; Susan Tanner
-
Journal of Response to Writing Apr 2026Mehrzad, Mohaddeseh; Rahimi, Mohammad; Link, Stephanie
-
Written Communication Mar 2026Matthew Overstreet; Silvia Vaccino-Salvadore; Diana Akhmedjanova
-
Written Communication Jan 2026Zhijun Gao; Lin Dong; Jiangying Wang
-
Pedagogy Jan 2026Krysten Stein; Kishonna Gray