Abstract

This article uses a novel theoretical frame—materio-cognitivism—to explore how digital writing processes change with time and experience. Researchers observed 10 second langauge writers as they completed two research writing tasks—one at the start of their first year of university and one near the end of university. Interviews and screen recording were used to track writing activity. Five key writing strategies were identified. Among the most improved writers, researchers identified a set of shared changes in how writing strategies were deployed. In particular, the most improved writers showed increased ability to sequence subtasks, to arrange digital interfaces, and to combine internal cognitive functions with the affordances of digital tools. These findings suggest what the development of writing processes might look like in digital environments, potentially informing both writing pedagogy and assessment.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
10.1177/07410883251410154
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Written Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 26 works outside this index ↓
  1. Atkinson D. (2010). Extended embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 31(5) 59…
  2. Beauvais C. Olive T. Passerault J. M. (2011). Why are some texts good and others not? Relationship between te…
  3. Chien S. C. (2012). Students’ use of writing strategies and their English writing achievements in Taiwan. Asi…
  4. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001
  5. 10.1037/10903-000
  6. Gánem-Gutiérrez G. A. Gilmore A. (2018). Tracking the real-time evolution of a writing event: Second language…
  7. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.04.001
  8. 10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.187
  9. Hort S. (2020). Digital writing word processors and operations in texts: How student writers use digital reso…
  10. Kim H. (2020). Profiles of undergraduate student writers: Differences in writing strategy and impacts on text…
  11. Kirkpatrick L. C. Klein P. D. (2016). High-achieving high school students’ strategies for writing from intern…
  12. 10.1177/0193841X07303318
  13. Kocatepe M. (2021). Reconceptualising the notion of finding information: How undergraduate students construct…
  14. Lei X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing a…
  15. Lei X. (2016). Understanding writing strategy use from a sociocultural perspective: The case of skilled and l…
  16. 10.3998/mpub.11657120
  17. Manchón R. M. (2018). Past and future research agendas on writing strategies: Conceptualizations inquiry meth…
  18. Ou A. W. Malmström H. (2023). ‘It becomes increasingly complex to deal with multiple channels’: Materialised …
  19. Overstreet M. Akhmedjanova D. Vaccino-Salvadore S. (2023). Brain-bound vs. extended: Contrasting approaches t…
  20. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.005
  21. Sasaki M. Mizumoto A. Murakami A. (2018). Developmental trajectories in L2 writing strategy use: A self-regul…
  22. 10.21432/T28G6K
  23. Stapleton P. (2010). Writing in an electronic age: A case study of L2 composing processes. Journal of English…
  24. Uludag P. McDonough K. (2022). Validating a rubric for assessing integrated writing in an EAP context. Assess…
  25. Wingate U. Harper R. (2021). Completing the first assignment: A case study of the writing processes of a succ…
  26. 10.2307/3586647
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →