Time, Space, and Tools: A Materio-cognitive Model of Digital Writing Process Development

Matthew Overstreet American University of Sharjah ; Silvia Vaccino-Salvadore American University of Sharjah ; Diana Akhmedjanova National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract

This article uses a novel theoretical frame—materio-cognitivism—to explore how digital writing processes change with time and experience. Researchers observed 10 second langauge writers as they completed two research writing tasks—one at the start of their first year of university and one near the end of university. Interviews and screen recording were used to track writing activity. Five key writing strategies were identified. Among the most improved writers, researchers identified a set of shared changes in how writing strategies were deployed. In particular, the most improved writers showed increased ability to sequence subtasks, to arrange digital interfaces, and to combine internal cognitive functions with the affordances of digital tools. These findings suggest what the development of writing processes might look like in digital environments, potentially informing both writing pedagogy and assessment.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
10.1177/07410883251410154
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (44) · 10 in this index

  1. Atkinson D. (2010). Extended embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 31(5) 59…
  2. Beauvais C. Olive T. Passerault J. M. (2011). Why are some texts good and others not? Relationship between te…
  3. Constructing grounded theory
  4. Chien S. C. (2012). Students’ use of writing strategies and their English writing achievements in Taiwan. Asi…
  5. Written Communication
Show all 44 →
  1. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001
  2. 10.1037/10903-000
  3. Contemporary perspectives on cognition and writing
  4. Learning by expanding
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Gánem-Gutiérrez G. A. Gilmore A. (2018). Tracking the real-time evolution of a writing event: Second language…
  7. Stimulated recall methodology in second language research
  8. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.04.001
  9. 10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.187
  10. Journal of Academic Writing
  11. Computers and Composition
  12. Kim H. (2020). Profiles of undergraduate student writers: Differences in writing strategy and impacts on text…
  13. Journal of Writing Research
  14. 10.1177/0193841X07303318
  15. Kocatepe M. (2021). Reconceptualising the notion of finding information: How undergraduate students construct…
  16. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development
  17. Lei X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing a…
  18. Lei X. (2016). Understanding writing strategy use from a sociocultural perspective: The case of skilled and l…
  19. 10.3998/mpub.11657120
  20. College Composition and Communication
  21. Manchón R. M. (2018). Past and future research agendas on writing strategies: Conceptualizations inquiry meth…
  22. The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes…
    Writing in Foreign Language Contexts: Learning, Teaching, and Research
  23. Qualitative research design: An interactive design
  24. Ou A. W. Malmström H. (2023). ‘It becomes increasingly complex to deal with multiple channels’: Materialised …
  25. Computers and Composition
  26. Overstreet M. Akhmedjanova D. Vaccino-Salvadore S. (2023). Brain-bound vs. extended: Contrasting approaches t…
  27. Handbook of writing research
  28. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.005
  29. College Composition and Communication
  30. Sasaki M. Mizumoto A. Murakami A. (2018). Developmental trajectories in L2 writing strategy use: A self-regul…
  31. 10.21432/T28G6K
  32. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations
  33. Stapleton P. (2010). Writing in an electronic age: A case study of L2 composing processes. Journal of English…
  34. Stemler S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus consistency and measurement approaches to estimating interrat…
  35. Assessing Writing
  36. Writing processes, text quality, and task effects: Empirical studies in first and second …
  37. Computers and Composition
  38. Wingate U. Harper R. (2021). Completing the first assignment: A case study of the writing processes of a succ…
  39. 10.2307/3586647