Abstract

AbstractThis article offers slow peer review as an approach to student-to-student peer review in the writing classroom. Slow peer review is based in the values and theories of rhetorical feminism and, when executed purposefully, can function as a fitting alternative to fake news rhetoric. In addition to articulating the steps of slow peer review, this article illustrates how two students in a sophomore-level writing class engaged in the practice. Initial results suggest that nondirective description can lead to meaningful changes in student writing. The article concludes with further considerations for writing teachers who wish to conduct slow peer review in their own classrooms.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2021-04-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-8811551
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. College Composition and Communication

References (20) · 4 in this index

  1. Reading Practices in the Writing Classroom
    WPA
  2. Welcome to the Era of Fake News
    Media and Communication  
  3. The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy
  4. Virtual Peer Review: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Online Environments
  5. Introduction: Response-Ability: Toward Systematic Collaborative Peer Review and Response …
Show all 20 →
  1. Rhetorical Feminism and This Thing Called Hope
  2. Thinking, Fast and Slow
  3. Toward a New Rhetoric of Difference
  4. Post-truth Rhetoric and Composition
  5. Post-truth
  6. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  7. Slow Reading in a Hurried Age
  8. College Composition and Communication
  9. Rhetoric Review
  10. Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness
  11. Peer Review for Peer Review's Sake: Resituating Peer Review Pedagogy
  12. From Cruel to Collegial: Developing a Professional Ethic in Peer Response to Student Writing
  13. Multiliteracies for a Digital Age
  14. Literacy in Composition Studies
  15. What Every Student Should Know about Practicing Peer Review