Abstract

Cultural rhetorics—as orientation, methodology, and practice—has made meaningful contributions to writing pedagogy (Brooks-Gillies et al.; Cedillo and Bratta; Baker-Bell; Cedillo et al.; Cobos et al.; Condon and Young; Powell). Despite these contributions, classroom teachers and writing program administrators can struggle to conceptualize assessment beyond bureaucratic practice and their role in assessment beyond standing in loco for the institution. To more fully realize the potential of cultural rhetorics in our classrooms and programs, the field needs assessment models that seek to uncover the counterstories of writing and meaning-making. Our work, at the intersections of queer rhetorics and writing assessment, provides a theoretical framework called Queer Validity Inquiry (QVI) that disrupts stock stories of success—a success that is always available to some at the expense of others. Through four diffractive lenses—failure, affectivity, identity, and materiality—QVI prompts us to determine what questions about student writers and their writing intrigue us, why we care about them, and whose interests are being served by those questions.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2023-09-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc202332674
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College English

References (37) · 6 in this index

  1. Linguistic Justice: Black Language, Literacy, Identity, and Pedagogy
  2. Routledge Companion to Digital Writing & Rhetoric
  3. Research in Written Composition
  4. A Cultural Rhetorics Approach to Understanding Power Dynamics within a University Writing…
    Praxis
  5. Assessment in Early Childhood Settings: Learning Stories
Show all 37 →
  1. Writing Assessment, Social Justice, and the Advancement of Opportunity
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Listening to Stories: Practicing Cultural Rhetorics Pedagogy: A Virtual Roundtable
    Constellations: A Cultural Rhetorics Publishing Space
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. Performing Antiracist Pedagogy in Rhetoric Writing and Communication
  6. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy
  7. Designing Assignments in the ChatGPT Era
    Inside Higher Ed
  8. College Composition and Communication
  9. Famous Last Words: The American Language Crisis Reconsidered
  10. Direct Versus Indirect Assessment of Student Learning
  11. The Measurement of Skill in Writing
    School Review  
  12. Making Learning Visible
  13. Should the General Composition Test Be Continued? The Test Satisfies an Educational Need
    College Board Review
  14. No, ChatGPT Is Not the End of High School English. But Here’s the Useful Tool It Offers T…
    Forbes
  15. 10.1080/00380237.2000.10571154
  16. The End of High-School English
    The Atlantic
  17. Antiracist Writing Assessment Ecologies Teaching and Assessing Writing for a Socially Jus…
  18. Neurodivergence and Intersectionality in Labor-Based Grading Contracts
    Journal of Writing Assessment
  19. The College Essay Is Dead: Nobody Is Prepared for How AI Will Transform Academia
    The Atlantic
  20. Counterstory: The Rhetoric and Writing of Critical Race Theory
  21. Performing Antiracist Pedagogy in Rhetoric, Writing, and Communication
  22. On the Structure of Educational Assessments
    Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives
  23. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism
  24. Pedagogy
  25. The Library of Missing Datasets
    Mixed Media Installation
  26. Our Story Begins Here: Constellating Cultural Rhetorics
    enculturation
  27. Will Artificial Intelligence Kill College Writing?
    The Chronicle Review
  28. When Students Have Power: Negotiating Authority in a Critical Pedagogy
  29. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  30. College English
  31. Failing Sideways: Queer Possibilities for Writing Assessment
  32. Do Learning Stories Tell the Whole Story of Children’s Learning? A Phenomenographic Enquiry
    Early Years