Abstract

Contract grading has achieved some prominence in our field as a practice associated with critical pedagogy. In this context we describe a hybrid grading contract where students earn a course grade of B based not on our evaluation of their writing quality but solely on their completion of the specified activities. The contract lists activities we’ve found most reliable in producing B-quality writing over fourteen weeks. Higher grades are awarded to students who produce exemplary portfolios. Thus we freely give students lots of evaluative feedback on their writing, but students can count on a course grade of B if they do all the required activities—no matter our feedback. Our goal in using contracts is to enable teachers and students to give as much attention as possible to writing and as little as possible to grades.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2009-12-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20099471
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (20)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Assessing Writing
  3. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  4. Pedagogy
  5. Pedagogy
Show all 20 →
  1. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  2. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  3. Communication Design Quarterly
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Assessing Writing
  7. Assessing Writing
  8. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  9. Pedagogy
  10. Assessing Writing
  11. Assessing Writing
  12. Pedagogy
  13. College Composition and Communication
  14. College Composition and Communication
  15. Pedagogy

References (0)

No references on file for this article.