Cultural rhetorics—as orientation, methodology, and practice—has made meaningful contributions to writing pedagogy (Brooks-Gillies et al.; Cedillo and Bratta; Baker-Bell; Cedillo et al.; Cobos et al.; Condon and Young; Powell). Despite these contributions, classroom teachers and writing program administrators can struggle to conceptualize assessment beyond bureaucratic practice and their role in assessment beyond standing in loco for the institution. To more fully realize the potential of cultural rhetorics in our classrooms and programs, the field needs assessment models that seek to uncover the counterstories of writing and meaning-making. Our work, at the intersections of queer rhetorics and writing assessment, provides a theoretical framework called Queer Validity Inquiry (QVI) that disrupts stock stories of success—a success that is always available to some at the expense of others. Through four diffractive lenses—failure, affectivity, identity, and materiality—QVI prompts us to determine what questions about student writers and their writing intrigue us, why we care about them, and whose interests are being served by those questions.

Preview this article: Valuing Editorial Collaborations as Scholarship: A Survey of Tenure and Promotion Documents, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/81/4/collegeenglish30084-1.gif

The article describes and analyzes the exclusion of LGBT content in composition courses by reporting on a study of how queerness is (and is not) incorporated into first-year writing courses. The authors critically examine the presence or absence of LGBT issues in first-year composition readers; offer analyses of how some first-year readers handle issues of queerness; and consider how queerness, when it is included in composition textbooks, is framed rhetorically as a subject for writing. The article concludes with recommendations for those seeking to explore issues of sexuality in ways that are productive for students, other faculty, and our profession. Ultimately, the authors demonstrate that, while some ground has been gained in understanding sexual difference as an important domain for students to explore, there is still much work to be done in creating textbooks that invite students to think critically and usefully about the interconnections among sexuality, literacy, and writing.

_ nce, in an early British literature course, I was assigned to write an analysis of Shakespeare's That time of year thou mayest in me behold. I tried hard to get myself out of the essay (and thus out of the sonnet), but my effort was a C at best. On the last page, my professor drew a large box (to represent the whole sonnet) and three smaller boxes inside (to represent the parts of the sonnet). Paraphrasing John Ciardi, she wrote

Preview this article: Written through the Body: Disruptions and "Personal" Writing, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ce/66/1/collegeenglish2822-1.gif

Oral interpretation courses, designed to be about communication, can serve as a site for thinking about what meanings writers communicate, as well as how interpreters become communicators in larger social discourses through interactions with written texts.