Abstract

Teaching nontraditional themes in first-year writing courses sometimes confuses students and frustrates instructors. This article shows how using a transformative, critical-thinking pedagogy challenges the content and purpose of “English” courses—making such themes more accessible while improving students’ use of rhetorical inquiry to both analyze and compose texts.

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2014-01-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-2348929
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Pedagogy

References (17) · 2 in this index

  1. Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method
  2. How We Construe Is How We Construct
  3. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the Classification of Educational Goals
  4. Developing Critical Thinkers: Challenging Adults to Explore Alternative Ways of Thinking …
  5. Biographia Literaria. In English Romantic Writers
Show all 17 →
  1. Council for Aid to Education, Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA), www.collegiatelearningassessment.org/ (ac…
  2. Literacy, Strength and Identity
  3. Dutta Soumitra Mia Irene …
  4. Pedagogy
  5. Pedagogy
  6. Mia Irene . 2006. “The Global Information Technology Report 2005-2006: L…
  7. The Measurement of Civic Scientific Literacy
    Public Understanding of Science  
  8. Engaged and Engaging Science: A Component of a Good Liberal Education
    Peer Review
  9. St. Cloud State University. 2012. “English (ENGL) Undergraduate Course Descriptions,” in 2010-2012 Undergradu…
  10. Devising the Appropriate Program of Studies for the 21st Century English Major: The Consu…
    Minnesota English Journal
  11. World Economic Forum, “Reports: The Global Information Technology Report 2010-2011,” www.weforum.org/reports/…
  12. Composition and the Rhetoric of Science: Engaging the Dominant Discourse