Computers and Composition Jan 1998

The interdependency of fair use and the first amendment

TyAnna K. Herrington Georgia Institute of Technology
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
1998-01-01
DOI
10.1016/s8755-4615(98)90050-0
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Deets (2026)
    A quantitative, computational investigation of Computers and Composition: Using…
    Computers and Composition
  2. Szymanski (2015)
    Understanding the Journals that Write Us: A 30th Birthday Reflection
    Computers and Composition
  3. Herrington (2010)
    Copyright, Free Speech, and Democracy: Eldred v. Ashcroft and Its Implications …
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Rife (2007)
    The fair use doctrine: History, application, and implications for (new media) w…
    Computers and Composition
  5. DeVoss et al. (2006)
    Why Napster matters to writing: Filesharing as a new ethic of digital delivery
    Computers and Composition
Show all 7 →
  1. Herrington (1999)
    Work for Hire for Nonacademic Creators
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. HERRINGTON (1999)
    Who Owns My Work?: The State of Work for Hire for Academics in Technical Commun…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (38)

  1. Besek (1977)
    Fair use prior to the 1976 Copyright Act
    17th Annual institute on computer law: The evolving law of the Internet—commerce, free speech, security, obscenity, and entertainment
  2. Bielefield (1997)
    Technology and copyright
  3. Black, Hugo. (1961). Konigsberg v. State Bar, 366 U.S. 36, 81 S.Ct. 997, 6L.Ed.2d 105 (1961).
  4. (1970)
    Black's Law Dictionary
  5. Emerson (1970)
    The system of freedom of expression
Show all 38 →
  1. Evoy
  2. Goldstein (1970)
    Copyright and the first amendment
    Columbia Law Review  ↗
  3. Gordon (1993)
    A property right in self-expression: Equality and individualism in the natural law of int…
    Yale Law Journal  ↗
  4. Harper & Row, Publishers v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985).
  5. Hartnett (1989)
    A new era for copyright law: Reconstituting the fair use doctrine
    New York Law School Law Review
  6. Hemner (1979)
    Communication under law
  7. Halliday v. CNN, No. CV 92-3287 IH (C.D. Cal. June 11, 1993).
  8. Holmes, J. (1919). Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630.
  9. Kreiss (1995)
    Accessibility and commercialization in copyright in copyright theory
    UCLA Law Review
  10. Latman (1958)
    Fair use of copyrighted works
    Reprinted as Study No. 14 in Copyright Law Revision Study
  11. Lawrence (1989)
    Donald Duck v. Chilean socialism: A fair use exchange
    Fair Use and Free Inquiry: Copyright Law and the New Media
  12. Lipscomb (1904)
    The writings of Thomas Jefferson
  13. Meeropol v. Nizer, 560 F.2d 1061 (2d Cir. 1977).
  14. Patry (1995)
    The fair use privilege in copyright law
  15. Patterson (1996)
    Copyright and free speech rights
    Journal of Intellectual Property Law
  16. Patterson (1991)
    The nature of copyright
  17. Perritt (1995)
    Sources of rights to access public information
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
  18. Plowman (1980)
    Copyright: Intellectual property in the information age
  19. Redish (1984)
    Freedom of expression: A critical analysis
  20. Reis (1995)
    The Rodney King beating—beyond fair use: A broadcaster's right to air copyrighted videota…
    John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
  21. Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1966).
  22. Rushdie (1991)
    Excerpts from Rushdie's address: 1,000 days ‘trapped inside a metaphor’
    New York Times
  23. Samuelson (1996)
    Legally speaking: The NII Intellectual Property Report
  24. Schuster (1993)
    The first amendment in the balance
  25. Shiffrin (1991)
    The first amendment
  26. Shipley (1986)
    Conflicts between copyright and the first amendment after Harper and Row, Publishers v. N…
    Brigham Young University Law Review, 1986
  27. Tedford (1993)
    Freedom of speech in the United States
  28. Time, Inc. v. Bernard Geis Associates, 293 F. Supp. 130 (S.D. N.Y. 1968).
  29. Toole (1995)
    Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.: The rap on remedies
    Indiana Law Review  ↗
  30. Vergobbi (1992)
    News ‘product’ and the first amendment: Corporate vs. legal claims to news ownership
    Communication Law
  31. (1994)
    Intellectual property and the national information infrastructure (NII) White Paper
  32. Yonover (1996)
    The precarious balance: Moral rights, parody, and fair use
    Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal
  33. Zimmerman (1986)
    A regulatory theory of copyright: Avoiding a first amendment conflict
    Emory Law Journal
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network → Build reading path →