Computers and Composition Jan 2007

The fair use doctrine: History, application, and implications for (new media) writing teachers

Martine Courant Rife Lansing Community College
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2007-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2007.02.002
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (8)

  1. Edwards (2018)
    Circulation Gatekeepers: Unbundling the Platform Politics of YouTube's Content ID
    Computers and Composition
  2. Edwards (2016)
    Framing Remix Rhetorically: Toward A Typology of Transformative Work
    Computers and Composition
  3. Turnley (2011)
    Towards a Mediological Method: A Framework for Critically Engaging Dimensions o…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Sano-Franchini (2010)
    Intellectual Property and the Cultures of BitTorrent Communities
    Computers and Composition
  5. Laquintano (2010)
    Manufacturing Scarcity: Online Poker, Digital Writing, and the Flow of Intellec…
    Computers and Composition
Show all 8 →
  1. Dubisar et al. (2010)
    Palin/Pathos/Peter Griffin: Political Video Remix and Composition Pedagogy
    Computers and Composition
  2. DeVoss (2010)
    English Studies and Intellectual Property
    Pedagogy
  3. McKee (2008)
    Ethical and legal issues for writing researchers in an age of media convergence
    Computers and Composition

References (103) · 18 in this index

  1. A&M Records Inc. v. Napster, Inc. (2001). 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir.).
  2. American Library Association [ALA]. (2004). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. C…
  3. Arnstein v. Marks Music Corporation. (1936). 82 F. 2d 275 (2 Cir.).
  4. Band, Jonathon. (2005). The Grokster scorecard. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from <http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/…
  5. Bartow (1998)
    Educational fair use in copyright: Reclaiming the right to photocopy freely
    University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Show all 103 →
  1. Basic Books Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp. (1991). 758 F. Supp. 1522, 1528-29 (S.D.N.Y.).
  2. Ben-Tech Industrial Automation, et al. v. Oakland University and Donald Mayer, & Eric Kaczor. (2005, January …
  3. Billings (2003)
    Plagiarism in academia and beyond: What is the role of the courts?
    University of San Francisco Law Review
  4. Brandfonbrener, Eric D. (1986). Note, fair use and university photocopying: Addison-Wesley Publishing v. New …
  5. Brockmann (1988)
    Does Clio Have a Place in Technical Writing? Considering Patents in a History o…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  6. Brockmann (1998)
    From Millwrights to shipwrights to the twenty-first century: Explorations in a history of technical communication in the United States
  7. Brockmann (1999)
    Oliver Evans and his antebellum wrestling with theoretical arrangement
    Three keys to the past: The history of technical communication
  8. Bulun Bulun v. R&T Textiles Pty. Ltd. (1998). 41 I.P.R. 513.
  9. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (1994). 510 U.S. 569, 583–585.
  10. Cary v. Kearsley. (1802). 4 Esp. 168, 170 Eng. Rep. 679.
  11. Creative Commons license wins first legal challenge. (2006, March 17). Retrieved June 24, 2006, from <http://…
  12. Creative Commons. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from <http://www.creativecommons.org>
  13. Darrell v. Joe Morris Music Co. (1940). 113 F. 2d 80 (2nd Cir.).
  14. DeVoss et al. (2005)
    Infrastructure and Composing: The When of New-Media Writing
    College Composition and Communication
  15. DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole, & Porter, James E. (2006a). Rethinking plagiarism in the digital age: Remixing as a …
  16. DeVoss et al. (2006)
    Why Napster matters to writing: Filesharing as a new ethic of digital delivery
    Computers and Composition
  17. DeVoss et al. (2002)
    “It wasn’t me, was it?” Plagiarism and the Web
    Computers and Composition
  18. Dodsely v. Kinnersley. (1761). 27 Eng. Rep. 270, (Ch. 1761).
  19. Duhl (2004)
    Old lyrics, knock-off videos, and copycat comic books: The fourth fair use factor in U.S.…
    Syracuse Law Review
  20. Durack (1997)
    Gender, Technology, and the History of Technical Communication
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  21. Durack (2001)
    Research Opportunities in the US Patent Record
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  22. Durscht (1996)
    Judicial plagiarism: It may be fair use but is it ethical?
    Cardozo Law Review
  23. Encyclopedia, Britannica Educational Corp. v. Crooks. (1982). 542 F. Supp. 1156 (W.D.N.Y.).
  24. Fisher, William W., & McGeveran, William. (2006, August). The digital learning challenge: Obstacles to educat…
  25. Folsom v. Marsh. (1841). 9 F.Cas. 342, 6 Hunt Mer. Mag. 175. Retrieved April 17, 2005, from <http://www.facul…
  26. Gasaway, Lolly, J. D. (2003). When works pass into the public domain. University of North Carolina. Retrieved…
  27. Gellar (2000)
    Copyright history and the future: What's culture got to do with it?
    Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA
  28. Green (2002)
    Plagiarism, norms, and the limits of theft law: Some observations on the use of criminal …
    Hastings Law Journal
  29. Gurak, Laura J. (2005). Ethics and technical communication in a digital age. Technical Communication and the …
  30. Gurak et al. (1998)
    Letter from the guest editors
    Computers and Composition
  31. Gyles v. Wilcox. (1740). 26 Eng. Rep. 489 (Ch. 1740).
  32. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters. (1985). 471 U.S. 539, 589–90.
  33. Heins, Marjorie, & Beckles, Tricia. (2005, December). Will fair use survive? Free expression in the age of co…
  34. Herrington (1997)
    The unseen “other” of intellectual property law or intellectual property is not property:…
    Kairos
  35. Herrington (1998)
    The interdependency of fair use and the first amendment
    Computers and Composition
  36. Herrington (2001)
    Controlling voices: Intellectual property, humanistic studies, and Internet
  37. Hesse (2005)
    Who Owns Writing?
    College Composition and Communication
  38. Howard (1995)
    Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty
    College English
  39. Howard (2000)
    Sexuality, Textuality: The Cultural Work of Plagiarism
    College English
  40. In re Aimster Copyright Litigation. (2003). 334 F.3d 643 (7th Cir.).
  41. Indiana University Policy on Fair Use of Copyrighted Works for Education and Research Statement of Supporting…
  42. Johnson-Eilola (1997)
    Intellectual property: Questions and answers
    Kairos
  43. Katz (2006)
    Pitfalls of open licensing: An analysis of Creative Commons licensing
    IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review
  44. Kent-Drury (1998)
    Finding a place to stand: Negotiating the spatial configuration of the networke…
    Computers and Composition
  45. Kitalong (1998)
    A web of symbolic violence
    Computers and Composition
  46. Klausman (1999)
    Instructional Note – Teaching about Plagiarism in the Age of the Internet
    Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  47. Lardner (1987)
    Fast forward Hollywood, the Japanese, and the VCR wars
  48. Lawrence v. Dana. (1869). 15 F. Cas. 26, 40 (C.C.D. Mass. 1869) (No. 8136).
  49. Lessig (1999)
    Code and other laws of cyberspace
  50. Lessig (2002)
    The future of ideas the fate of the commons in a connected world
  51. Lessig (2004)
    Free culture how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity
  52. Lessig, Lawrence. (2004b, May 12). Witness testimony. H.R. 107, the digital media consumers’ rights act of 20…
  53. Logie, John. (2005). Parsing codes: Intellectual property, technical communication, and the World Wide Web. T…
  54. Logie, John. (2006). Copyright in increasingly digital academic contexts: What it takes (WIDE paper #7). Retr…
  55. Lunsford (1999)
    Rhetoric, Feminism, and the Politics of Textual Ownership
    College English
  56. Lunsford (2000)
    Authorship and intellectual property
    Coming of age: The advanced writing curriculum
  57. Lunsford (1996)
    What matters who writes? What matters who responds? Issues of ownership in the writing cl…
    Kairos
  58. Macmillan Co. v. King. (1914). 223 F. 862 (D. Mass.).
  59. Mandich (1948)
    Venetian patents (1450–1550)
    Journal of the Patent Office Society
  60. Marcus v. Rowley. (1983). 695 F.2d 1171 (9th Cir.).
  61. May (2002)
    The Venetian moment: New technologies, legal innovation and the institutional origins of …
    Prometheus  ↗
  62. MGM v. Grokster. (2005, June). 545 U.S. _______. Retrieved June 27, 2005, from <http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM…
  63. Michigan State University University Relations Fair Use Guidelines. Retrieved January 9, 2006, from <http://w…
  64. Plagiarism Detection Services Bibliography. (2006). Retrieved September 9, 2006, from <http://ccccip.org/pds>
  65. Plagiarism.org. (2006). Retrieved September 9, 2006, from <http://www.turnitin.com/static/home.html>
  66. Porter (2005)
    The chilling of digital Information: Technical communicators as public advocates
    Technical communication and the World Wide Web in the new millennium
  67. Porter, Jim, & Rife, Martine. (2005, June). MGM v. Grokster: Implications for educators and writing teachers …
  68. Powell (2004)
    Down by the river, or how Susan La Flesche Picotte can teach us about alliance as a pract…
    College English
  69. Prager (1944)
    A history of intellectual property from 1545 to 1787
    Journal of the Patent Office Society
  70. Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, Inc. (1996). 1996 FED App. 0357P (6th Cir.). Retrie…
  71. Reyman (2006)
    Copyright, Distance Education, and the Teach Act: Implications for Teaching Writing
    College Composition and Communication
  72. Ricketson (1986)
    The birth of the Berne Union
    Columbia VLA Journal of Law and Arts
  73. Rife, Martine Courant. (2006a). Local global literacies for judges: Canadian/US judicial opinion approaches t…
     ↗
  74. Rife, Martine Courant. (2006b, Fall) Why Kairos matters to writing: A reflection on our intellectual property…
  75. Rife, Martine Courant. (2007, May). Technical communicators and digital writing risk assessment. Technical Co…
  76. Rife, Martine Courant, & DeVoss, Dànielle Nicole. (in press). Teaching plagiarism: Remix as composing. In Ann…
  77. Rife, Martine Courant, & Hart-Davidson, William. (2006). Digital composing and fair use: Exploring knowledge …
  78. Ringgold v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc. (1997). 126 F.3d 70 (2nd Cir.).
  79. Robbins (2003)
    Distributed Authorship: A Feminist Case-Study Framework for Studying Intellectu…
    College English
  80. Rose, Mark. (1996, Summer). Mothers and authors: Johnson v. Colbert and the new children of our imaginations.…
     ↗
  81. Rose (1988)
    The author as proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the genealogy of modern authorship
    Representations  ↗
  82. Roworth v. Wilkes. (1807). 170 Eng. Rep. 889.
  83. Sandoval v. New Line Cinema Corp. (1998). 147 F.3d 215 (2nd Cir.).
  84. Selber, Stuart. (2006). Beyond Napster: Institutional policies and digital economics (WIDE paper #6). Retriev…
  85. Sony Corp of America v. Universal Studios, Inc. (1984). 464 U.S. 417.
  86. Stanford Copyright & Fair Use. (2005). Retrieved December 30, 2005, from <http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyrig…
  87. Stearns (1992)
    Copy wrong: Plagiarism, process, property and the law
    California Law Review  ↗
  88. Stewart v. Abend. (1990). 495 U.S. 207, 237–38.
     ↗
  89. Turnitin. (2006). Retrieved September 9, 2006, from <http://www.turnitin.com/static/home.html>
  90. United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2003). Frequently asked questions about the database of Native Am…
  91. University of Texas Systems. (2005). Fair use of copyrighted materials. Retrieved December 30, 2005, from <ht…
  92. Vaidhyanathan (2004)
    The anarchist in the library: How the clash between freedom and control is hacking the real world and crashing the system
  93. Westbrook (2006)
    Visual Rhetoric in a Culture of Fear: Impediments to Multimedia Production
    College English
  94. Wihtol v. Crow. (1962). 309 F.2d 777 (8th Cir.).
  95. (1994)
    The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature
  96. Yu, Peter K. (2003). P2P and the future of private copying. University of Colorado Law Review (pp. 654–765). …
  97. Yu (2004)
    Symposium: Intellectual property at a crossroads: The use of the past in intellectual pro…
    Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
  98. Yu, Peter K. (2006). Web policy. Retrieved January 13, 2006, from <http://www.peteryu.com/webpolicy.htm>
CrossRef global citation count: 16 View in citation network → Build reading path →