Abstract

This essay examines the definitions and practices of argument perpetuated by popular composition textbooks, illustrating how even those texts that appear to forward expansive notions of argument ultimately limit it to an intent to persuade. In doing so, they help perpetuate constricted practices of argument within undergraduate composition classrooms.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2011-12-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc201118391
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Pedagogy
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Pedagogy

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →