Abstract

Composition studies seems relatively unified in the belief that “active,” “rhetorical,” and “conversational” modes of reading are students’ best hope for facing the challenges of college reading and writing tasks. As commonplaces, however, these descriptors mask both reading outcomes and the specific practices presumed to support them. Through an analysis of three popular composition textbooks, we disentangle and reveal some of the reading axiologies most fundamental to the field and which we contend these commonplaces gesture toward but leave vastly undertheorized. We argue that more precise explications of these distinct reading axiologies ultimately provide a contextualist framework for reading, helping students approach their reading-writing tasks with greater clarity, flexibility, and purpose.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc202476190
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (17)

  1. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  2. Pedagogy
  3. Pedagogy
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
Show all 17 →
  1. College English
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Research in the Teaching of English
  7. College English
  8. Written Communication
  9. College Composition and Communication
  10. College Composition and Communication
  11. College Composition and Communication
  12. College English
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. The Outcomes Book
  2. What Is College Reading?
  3. Inventing the University
    Journal of Basic Writing  
  4. Next Steps: New Directions for/in Writing about Writing
  5. I Don’t Teach Reading: Critical Reading Instruction in Composition Courses
    Literacy Research and Instruction  
  6. Teaching Readers in Post-Truth America
  7. Intertexts: Reading Pedagogy in College Writing Classrooms
  8. What We Mean When We Talk about Reading: Rethinking the Purposes and Contexts of College …
    Across the Disciplines: A Journal of Language, Learning and Academic Writing  
  9. Teaching Antiracist Reading
    Journal of College Reading and Learning  
  10. The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach
    New Literary History  
  11. Post-Truth Rhetoric and Composition
  12. Analysis of Expert Readers in Three Disciplines: History, Mathematics, and Chemistry
    Journal of Literacy Research  
  13. Deep Reading, Deep Learning
  14. On the Reading of Historical Texts: Notes on the Breach between School and Academy
    American Educational Research Journal  
  15. Lateral Reading and the Nature of Expertise: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluati…
    Teachers College Record  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →