Abstract

Creative writing workshops typically feature a gag rule and emphasize purported flaws. This structure limits students’ meaningful engagement with each other’s work; positions the author as inherently flawed; and positions other participants as authority figures, passing judgment without articulating their aesthetic standards. I propose an alternative structure in which authors lead discussion; the work is treated not as inherently flawed but as “in process”; and discussants articulate their expectations about “good” writing rather than allowing them to function as unspoken norms.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2009-06-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20097197
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Pedagogy
  2. Pedagogy
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Pedagogy

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 20 View in citation network →