Abstract

ABSTRACT This article posits that bringing diversity to histories of rhetoric may require not only revising canons but also “unwriting” the narratives of Western civilization in which canonical figures have been cast. Two conventions of these narratives are of special significance: fixed identities and narrative coherence. Focusing on the cultural contexts of Aelius Aristides’ “Regarding Sarapis,” we suggest that these conventions obscure the cultural differences that were always there.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2019-05-04
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2019.1618056
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. Roman Literary Cultures: Domestic Politics, Revolutionary Poetics, Civic Spectacle
  2. The New Urban Culture: Antioch, Alexandria, Pergamon
    Grand Street  
  3. Rethinking the Other in Antiquity
  4. Ælius Aristide Écrivain
  5. Egypt and the Limits of Hellenism
  6. Isis, Sarapis and Demeter in Antioch of Syria
    The Harvard Theological Review  
  7. Epideictic: Questioning the Stakes of Ancient Praise
  8. Moralia. Isis and Osiris
  9. Religious Mobility in the Roman Empire
    Journal of Roman Studies  
  10. Antonine Literature
  11. Inverting the Canon: Hermogenes on Literature
    Harvard Studies in Classical Philology  
  12. The Origins of the Cult of Sarapis
    History of Religions  
  13. Greeks and Barbarians
  14. The Kline of Sarapis
    The Harvard Theological Review  
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →