Abstract

Abstract This essays offers a rhetorical interpretation of judicial opinions Joseph Story wrote in four U.S. Supreme Court cases concerned with the slavery question: U.S. v. La Jeune Eugenie (1822), Groves v. Slaughter (1841), U.S. v. Amistad (1841), and Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842). I argue that Story, a jurist trained in the intellectual traditions of the early republic, performed judicial argument as a kind of rhetorical action dependent upon Ciceronian controversia, a mental habit of arguing pro et contra on any matter in dispute. In consequence of this approach to judicial argument, Story's opinions do not represent a choice between positive law or natural law, neither do they represent a commitment to legal instrumentalism or legal formalism; rather they present controversial responses to rhetorical situations broadly conceived.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2007-01-01
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2007.10557275
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. College English
Show all 7 →
  1. College English
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 26 works outside this index ↓
  1. The Classical Foundations of the American Constitution: Prevailing Wisdom.
  2. “The Genesis of Rhetorical Action.”
    Southern Communication Journal  
  3. “Philosophical Method in Cicero.”
    Journal of the History of Philosophy  
  4. Rhetoric in Greco-Roman Education.
  5. “Argument and the “Definition of the Situation.’”
    Central States Speech Journal  
  6. “The Rise and Fall of the Modes of Discourse.”
    College Composition and Communication  
  7. “Stasis.”
    Speech Monographs  
  8. “Pro Militibus Oratio: John Adams's Imitation of Cicero in the Boston Massacre Trial.”
    Rhetorica  
  9. “The Dynamics of Stasis: Classical Rhetorical Theory and Modern Legal Argumentation.”
    American Journal of Jurisprudence  
  10. The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860.
  11. “The Nature of Issues: A Constructive Approach to Situational Rhetoric.”
    Western Speech Communication  
  12. “Point of View in Rhetorical Situations: Classical and Romantic Contrasts and Contemporar…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  13. “How Great were the ‘Great’ Marshall Court Decisions?”
    Virginia Law Review  
  14. “The Idea of Rhetoric as Interpretive Practice: A Humanist's Response to Goankar.”
    Southern Communication Journal  
  15. “The Renaissance of American Public Address: Text and Context in Rhetorical Criticism.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  16. “Controversy as a Mode of Invention: The Example of James and Freud.”
    College English  
  17. “Inventing Authority: Bill Clinton, Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Orchestration of Rhe…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  18. Persons and Masks of the Law: Cardozo, Holmes, Jefferson, and Wythe as Makers of Masks.
  19. “Cultivating the ‘Higher Law’ in American Jurisprudence: John Quincy Adams, Neo-Classical…
    Southern Communication Journal  
  20. “Causation and Creativity in Rhetorical Situations: Distinctions and Implications.”
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  21. “‘Let the Constitution Perish’: Prigg v. Pennsylvania, Joseph Story, and the Flawed Doctr…
    Slavery and Abolition  
  22. “The Quest for Judicial Objectivity: The Marshall Court and the Legitimation of Slavery.”
    Stanford Law Review  
  23. “An Examination of the Constituent Elements in a Presently-Occurring Rhetorical Situation.”
    Central States Speech Journal  
  24. “Reinventing inventio.”
    College English  
  25. “‘I Had an Abortion’: The Rhetorical Situation of a Planned Parenthood T-Shirt.”
    Qualitative Research Reports in Communication  
  26. “Quintilian and the Rhetorical Revolution of the Middle Ages.”
    Rhetorica  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →