Assessing Writing Oct 2016

“I can see that”: Developing shared rubric category interpretations through score negotiation

Jonathan Trace ; Valerie Meier ; Gerriet Janssen
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2016-10-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics
assessment

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Siekmann et al. (2022)
    Structure and coherence as challenges in composition: A study of assessing less…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Mumford et al. (2021)
    Teachers’ perspectives on the causes of rater discrepancy in an English for Aca…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Wind (2020)
    Do raters use rating scale categories consistently across analytic rubric domai…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Wind et al. (2019)
    Exploring the correspondence between traditional score resolution methods and p…
    Assessing Writing

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Janssen et al. (2015)
    Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision
    Assessing Writing
  2. East (2009)
    Evaluating the reliability of a detailed analytic scoring rubric for foreign la…
    Assessing Writing
  3. JOHNSON et al. (2001)
    Score Resolution and the Interrater Reliability of Holistic Scores in Rating Essays
    Written Communication
  4. Weigle (1999)
    Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment: Quantitative and…
    Assessing Writing
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. Anton (2009)
    Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners
    Foreign Language Annals  ↗
  2. Bonk (2003)
    A many-facet Rasch analysis of the second language group oral discussion task
    Language Testing  ↗
  3. Brown (2011)
    Variables that affect the dependability of L2 pragmatics tests
    Journal of Pragmatics  ↗
  4. Eckes (2005)
    Examining rater effects in TestDaF writing and speaking performance assessments: A many-f…
    Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal  ↗
  5. Hodges (1992)
    Values as constraints on affordances: Perceiving and acting properly
    Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour  ↗
  6. Hodges (2007)
    Good prospects: Ecological and social perspectives on conforming, creating, and caring in…
    Language Sciences  ↗
  7. Hodges (2009)
    Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity, and caring
    Pragmatics & Cognition  ↗
  8. Johnson (2009)
    The influence of rater language background on writing performance assessment
    Language Testing  ↗
  9. Johnson (2000)
    The relation between score resolution methods and interrater reliability: An empirical st…
    Applied Measurement in Education  ↗
  10. Johnson (2005)
    Resolving score differences in the rating of writing samples: Does discussion improve the…
    Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal  ↗
  11. Kane (2012)
    Validating score interpretations and uses
    Language Testing  ↗
  12. Kane (2013)
    Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores
    Journal of Educational Measurement  ↗
  13. Knoch (2011)
    Investigating the effectiveness of individualized feedback to rating behavior: A longitud…
    Language Testing  ↗
  14. Kondo-Brown (2002)
    A FACETS analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese second language writing performance
    Language Testing  ↗
  15. Lim (2011)
    The development and maintenance of rating quality in performance writing assessment: A lo…
    Language Testing  ↗
  16. Lumley (1995)
    Rater characteristics and rater bias: Implications for training
    Language Testing  ↗
  17. Lynch (1998)
    Using G-theory and Many-facet Rasch measurement in the development of performance assessm…
    Language Testing  ↗
  18. McKelvey (1988)
    Differences in conformity among friends and strangers
    Psychological Reports  ↗
  19. Poehner (2005)
    Dynamic assessment in the language classroom
    Language Teaching Research  ↗
  20. Poehner (2007)
    Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning
    Modern Language Journal  ↗
  21. Schaefer (2008)
    Rater bias patterns in an EFL writing assessment
    Language Testing  ↗
  22. Upshur (1995)
    Constructing rating scales for second language tests
    ELT Journal  ↗
  23. Weigle (1998)
    Using FACETS to model rater training effects
    Language Testing  ↗
  24. Wigglesworth (1993)
    Exploring bias analysis as a tool for improving rater consistency in assessing oral interaction
    Language Testing  ↗
  25. Wray (2012)
    What do we (Think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play
    Annual Review of Applied Linguistics  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 25 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Aligning ACTFL writing proficiency guidelines with CEFR descriptors: Insights from Chinese writing assessment ↗
    Pei-Jiun Lan; Po-Hsi Chen; Shu-Huei Peng; Chia-Pi Chao; Tsung-An Wang; Wen-Hsun Tseng
    assessment
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Mar 2026
    Selections From the ABC 2025 Annual International Conference, Long Beach, California, USA: Classroom Activities for Teaching Career Readiness Skills in the Business Communication Classroom ↗
    Andrew Cavanaugh; D. Joel Whalen
    assessment writing across the curriculum multilingual writers
  3. Written Communication Feb 2026
    Reading Medium and Communicative Purpose in Writing: Effects on Pausing Behaviour and Text Quality, Controlling for Reading Comprehension and Executive Functions ↗
    Ángel Valenzuela; Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona; Ramón D. Castillo; Ladislao Salmerón
    assessment curriculum design multimodality multilingual writers revision
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jan 2026
    Business Communication as Cultural Text: The Use of Student-Made Online Advertisements in Teaching Intercultural Communicative Competence ↗
    Saheeh Shafi
    assessment multimodality online writing instruction multilingual writers
  5. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    Development of a Genre Adherence Rubric (GAR) for applied linguistics research articles ↗
    Mahsa Alinasab; Javad Gholami; Zhila Mohammadnia
    assessment scientific writing