Assessing Writing Jan 2010

Situated assessment: Limitations and promise

Melinda Kreth ; Mary Ann Crawford ; Marcy Taylor ; Elizabeth Brockman
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2010.03.001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Condon et al. (2004)
    Assessing and teaching what we value: The relationship between college-level wr…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Blattner et al. (2002)
    Developing a performance-based assessment of students’ critical thinking skills
    Assessing Writing
  3. Broad (2000)
    Pulling Your Hair Out: Crises of Standardization in Communal Writing Assessment
    Research in the Teaching of English
  4. HAYES et al. (2000)
    Does Holistic Assessment Predict Writing Performance?
    Written Communication
  5. Haswell (1998)
    Rubrics, prototypes, and exemplars: Categorization theory and systems of writin…
    Assessing Writing
Show all 7 →
  1. Purves (1995)
    Apologia Not Accepted
    College Composition and Communication
  2. Huot (1990)
    Reliability, Validity, and Holistic Scoring: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    College Composition and Communication
Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. Gleason (2000)
    Evaluating writing programs in real time: The politics of remediation
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  2. Huot (1996)
    Toward a new theory of writing assessment
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  3. Sommers (2004)
    The novice as expert: Writing the freshman year
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
  4. White (1995)
    Apologia for the timed impromptu essay test
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →