Assessing Writing Jan 2004

A comparison of generalizability theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in an analysis of college sophomore writing

Richard R Sudweeks ; Suzanne Reeve ; William S. Bradshaw
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2004-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2004.11.001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Poe et al. (2019)
    Evidence of fairness: Twenty-five years of research in Assessing Writing
    Assessing Writing
  2. Zheng et al. (2019)
    What has been assessed in writing and how? Empirical evidence from Assessing Wr…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Ohta et al. (2018)
    Integrated writing scores based on holistic and multi-trait scales: A generaliz…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Janssen et al. (2015)
    Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision
    Assessing Writing
  5. Gennaro (2013)
    How different are they? A comparison of Generation 1.5 and international L2 lea…
    Assessing Writing
Show all 6 →
  1. Huang (2012)
    Using generalizability theory to examine the accuracy and validity of large-sca…
    Assessing Writing

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. Brennan (1995)
    Generalizability of performance assessments
    Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice  ↗
  2. Ebel (1951)
    Estimation of the reliability of ratings
    Psychometrika  ↗
  3. Hoyt (2000)
    Rater bias in psychological research: When is it a problem and what can we do about it?
    Psychological Methods  ↗
  4. Marcoulides (1996)
    Estimating variance components in generalizability theory: The covariance structure analy…
    Structural Equation Modeling  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 68 View in citation network →