Assessing Perspectivalism in Patient Participation: An Evaluation of FDA Patient and Consumer Representative Programs

S. Scott Graham University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee ; Molly M. Kessler University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee ; Sang-Yeon Kim ; Seokhoon Ahn University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee ; Daniel Card

Abstract

Recent research in rhetoric of health and medicine (RHM) has worked to evaluate the effectiveness of patient inclusion initiatives in health policy decision-making. Extending this line of research, this article evaluates the extent to which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) patient and consumer representative programs meaningfully engage patient experiences. In so doing, this study provides directed and summative content analyses of pharmaceuticals policy deliberation at 163 FDA drug advisory committee meetings. The results indicate that the current implementation of the patient and consumer representative programs do not adequately ensure that patient experiences are being included as a part of advisory committee deliberation or subsequent pharmaceuticals policy. Additionally, the results presented support the growing concern that attempts to include patient perspectives in health policy may actually further marginalize patient populations.

Journal
Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
Published
2018-05-24
DOI
10.5744/rhm.2018.1006
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (0)

No references on file for this article.