Technical Communication Quarterly Apr 2019

Building Better Bridges: Toward a Transdisciplinary Science Communication

Jenell Johnson University of Wisconsin–Madison ; Michael A. Xenos University of Wisconsin–Madison

Abstract

In this article the authors envision a more durable and portable model of scholarship on public engagement with science through partnerships between rhetoricians of science and quantitative social scientists. The authors consider a number of barriers and limitations that make such partnerships difficult, with an eye toward discovering ways that researchers may overcome them. The authors conclude by articulating guidelines for reciprocal transdisciplinary work as well as specific recommended practices for such collaborations.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2019-04-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2019.1583378
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
service learning scientific writing
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Gruber et al. (2024)
    A Forum on Neurorhetorics: Conscious of the Past, Mindful of the Future
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (45) · 11 in this index

  1. 10.1162/jocn_a_00604
     ↗
  2. 10.1080/10570318009374018
     ↗
  3. Burke K. (1951)
    Rhetoric—Old and new
    Journal of General Education
  4. 10.7208/chicago/9780226099088.001.0001
     ↗
  5. Ceccarelli (2005)
    A Hard Look at Ourselves: A Reception Study of Rhetoric of Science
    Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 45 →
  1. Ceccarelli (2014)
    Where’s the Rhetoric? Broader Impacts in Collaborative Research
    Poroi
  2. 10.1177/0306312702032002003
     ↗
  3. Condit C. M. (1999)
    The meanings of the gene: Public debates about human heredity
  4. Defila R. (2017)
    The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity
     ↗
  5. Depew et al. (2013)
    The Productivity of Scientific Rhetoric
    Poroi
  6. Druschke (2014)
    With Whom Do We Speak? Building Transdisciplinary Collaborations in Rhetoric of…
    Poroi
  7. ENSN. (2008). Neuroschools . Retrieved from http://www.neurosocieties.eu/Neuroschools/neuroschools_main.htm
  8. Farrell T. B. (1995)
    Norms of rhetorical culture
  9. 10.1177/0306312714531473
     ↗
  10. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.001.0001
     ↗
  11. Galison P. (1997)
    Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics
  12. Graham et al. (2018)
    Assessing Perspectivalism in Patient Participation: An Evaluation of FDA Patien…
    Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
  13. Graham et al. (2015)
    Statistical Genre Analysis: Toward Big Data Methodologies in Technical Communication
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  14. 10.4324/9781315303758-15
     ↗
  15. Hawhee D. (2009)
    Moving bodies: Kenneth Burke at the edges of language
  16. Herndl et al. (2013)
    "How Can We Act?" A Praxiographical Program for the Rhetoric of Technology, Sci…
    Poroi
  17. Jack et al. (2010)
    “This is Your Brain on Rhetoric”: Research Directions for Neurorhetorics
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  18. 10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6_7
     ↗
  19. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.001.0001
     ↗
  20. 10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013016
     ↗
  21. Keränen L. (2010)
    Scientific characters: Rhetoric, politics, and trust in breast cancer research
  22. Keranen (2013)
    Conspectus: Inventing Futures for the Rhetoric of Science, Technology, and Medicine
    Poroi
  23. 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007
     ↗
  24. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.3
     ↗
  25. 10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001
     ↗
  26. Latour B. (1987)
    Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society
  27. 10.1080/10570318009374019
     ↗
  28. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00149
     ↗
  29. 10.1080/01463373.2015.1103592
     ↗
  30. Merton R. K. (1942)
    The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations
  31. 10.2307/2094423
     ↗
  32. 10.1177/1081180X02251047
     ↗
  33. Plato Gorgias (1937). In The Dialogues of Plato . Trans. B. Jowett. New York NY: Random House.
  34. Prelli (2013)
    The Prospect of Invention in Rhetorical Studies of Science, Technology, and Medicine
    Poroi
  35. 10.7208/chicago/9780226497952.001.0001
     ↗
  36. 10.7208/chicago/9780226703152.001.0001
     ↗
  37. 10.1023/A:1021152023349
     ↗
  38. Rogers E. M. (1994)
    History of communication study
  39. 10.1073/pnas.1317516111
     ↗
  40. Walker (2014)
    Rhetorical Properties of Scientific Uncertainties: Public Engagement in the Car…
    Poroi
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy Aug 2025
    From Information to Action: Technical (Science) Communication and Digital Engagement ↗
    Daniel Card; Danielle DeVasto
    service learning technical communication scientific writing
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly Jan 2024
    Reddit and Engaged Science Communication Online: An Examination of Reddit’s R/Science Ask-Me-Anythings and Science Discussion Series ↗
    Devon Moriarty; Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher
    genre theory service learning scientific writing
  3. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric Sep 2016
    Community Resilience through Public Engagement: A Study of Outreach and Science Communication in a Coastal National Park Site ↗
    Jamie Remillard
    rhetorical criticism service learning scientific writing qualitative research
  4. Poroi Jan 2014
    Rhetorical Properties of Scientific Uncertainties: Public Engagement in the Carson Scholars Program ↗
    Kenny C Walker
    rhetorical criticism service learning scientific writing
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly Jul 2013
    Lessons in Service Learning: Developing the Service Learning Opportunities in Technical Communication (SLOT-C) Database ↗
    Susan A. Youngblood; Jo Mackiewicz
    service learning technical communication professional writing scientific writing editorial matter