Building Better Bridges: Toward a Transdisciplinary Science Communication

Jenell Johnson University of Wisconsin–Madison ; Michael A. Xenos University of Wisconsin–Madison

Abstract

In this article the authors envision a more durable and portable model of scholarship on public engagement with science through partnerships between rhetoricians of science and quantitative social scientists. The authors consider a number of barriers and limitations that make such partnerships difficult, with an eye toward discovering ways that researchers may overcome them. The authors conclude by articulating guidelines for reciprocal transdisciplinary work as well as specific recommended practices for such collaborations.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2019-04-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2019.1583378
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Poroi
  3. Poroi
  4. Poroi
  5. Poroi
Show all 10 →
  1. Poroi
  2. Poroi
  3. Poroi
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1162/jocn_a_00604
  2. 10.1080/10570318009374018
  3. 10.7208/chicago/9780226099088.001.0001
  4. 10.1177/0306312702032002003
  5. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity
  6. 10.1177/0306312714531473
  7. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.001.0001
  8. 10.5744/rhm.2018.1006
  9. 10.4324/9781315303758-15
  10. 10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6_7
  11. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.001.0001
  12. 10.1108/S1057-6290(2011)0000013016
  13. 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007
  14. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.3
  15. 10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001
  16. 10.1080/10570318009374019
  17. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00149
  18. 10.1080/01463373.2015.1103592
  19. 10.2307/2094423
  20. 10.1177/1081180X02251047
  21. 10.7208/chicago/9780226497952.001.0001
  22. 10.7208/chicago/9780226703152.001.0001
  23. 10.1023/A:1021152023349
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1317516111
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →