Student Perceptions of AI-Assisted Institutional Emails

My Khanh Huynh Eastern International University ; Tuan Anh Tran-Pham Eastern International University ; Huu Khang Nguyen

Abstract

This study investigates how students interpret AI-assisted written communication in a university context. Although AI assistant programs are increasingly used to draft institutional emails, little is known about whether they enhance clarity or undermine trust and perceived professionalism. Using survey data from 194 Vietnamese undergraduates, the study validates four constructs including perceived usefulness, trust, perceived professionalism, and attitudes toward AI assistant programs, and examines their effects on students’ intention to read emails frequently. Results show that students clearly distinguish clarity benefits from credibility concerns, indicating that AI-assisted emails can improve comprehension.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
10.1177/23294906261418213
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (112) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858
  2. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. 10.3389/feduc.2023.1226718
  4. 10.3390/educsci15040501
  5. 10.32674/jis.v8i3.54
Show all 112 →
  1. 10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3
  2. 10.1111/itor.12963
  3. 10.1207/s15327051hci2001&2_4
  4. 10.1007/s10734-017-0187-0
  5. Calvino F. Fontanelli L. (2023). A portrait of AI adopters across countries: Firm characteristics assets’ com…
  6. 10.1108/JABS-08-2024-0444
  7. Cardon P. W. Coman A. W. (2025). Professionalism and trustworthiness in AI-assisted workplace writing: The be…
  8. 10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
  9. 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
  10. 10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426
  11. 10.1108/ITP-02-2025-0163
  12. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  13. Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice
  14. 10.1080/17439884.2025.2518258
  15. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  16. 10.2307/249008
  17. 10.1080/02680513.2018.1556090
  18. 10.1080/10447318.2024.2352921
  19. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x
  20. 10.1111/bjet.13558
  21. 10.1177/0011392111402585
  22. 10.1111/bjet.13544
  23. 10.1080/03634520903131154
  24. 10.5688/aj7410191
  25. 10.1177/002224378101800104
  26. 10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00051-3
  27. 10.1109/TEM.2003.817277
  28. 10.3390/admsci13090196
  29. 10.2307/2649334
  30. 10.1080/1360080X.2024.2344234
  31. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191628
  32. Research in the sociology of organizations
  33. 10.1007/s10796-010-9242-4
  34. 10.1080/07853890.2024.2398202
  35. 10.1080/23311983.2018.1514953
  36. 10.1007/978-3-031-56586-1_58
  37. 10.22323/2.23030205
  38. 10.22323/2.24020207
  39. 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  40. 10.3390/educsci12070484
  41. 10.1080/10494820.2024.2350655
  42. The working sovereign: Labour and democratic citizenship
  43. 10.1002/pits.23295
  44. 10.1086/266350
  45. 10.1186/s41239-025-00524-2
  46. 10.1007/s10639-021-10707-9
  47. 10.5430/wjel.v14n2p502
  48. 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045754
  49. 10.3390/educsci15020174
  50. 10.1186/s41239-025-00555-9
  51. 10.46853/001c.27434
  52. 10.1002/casp.2492
  53. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101387
  54. 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.152
  55. 10.1007/s10639-023-12333-z
  56. 10.3991/ijet.v18i14.41725
  57. 10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
  58. Context matters: How organizational climate and technological maturity shape trust in art…
    Journal of Applied Psychology
  59. 10.1080/08934210409389382
  60. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105789
  61. 10.1108/JICE-03-2024-0010
  62. 10.1016/j.sbr.2025.100022
  63. 10.22521/edupij.2025.16.283
  64. Psychometric theory
  65. 10.1108/HESWBL-09-2018-0089
  66. 10.1186/s41235-024-00573-7
  67. 10.1007/s40299-021-00629-y
  68. 10.1177/14648849241299775
  69. 10.5688/ajpe8391
  70. 10.1080/07377363.2021.2005759
  71. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105516
  72. 10.36892/ijlts.v6i4.638
  73. 10.1007/s10639-024-12592-4
  74. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  75. Breaking barriers in marketing education: Addressing sensitive topics through experientia…
    Marketing Education Review
  76. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  77. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  78. 10.1177/1521025117696823
  79. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.075
  80. 10.1080/15391523.2012.10782602
  81. Evaluating AI-powered learning assistants in engineering higher education: Student engage…
    arXiv
  82. 10.1007/s10639-025-13712-4
  83. 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2
  84. 10.3390/su13137074
  85. 10.1080/03634520902926851
  86. 10.2190/EC.37.3.d
  87. 10.1080/13603108.2024.2440705
  88. 10.2139/ssrn.4378735
  89. 10.1111/1467-8608.00257
  90. 10.1038/s41598-024-53335-2
  91. 10.1080/01973530903539895
  92. 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00097-4
  93. 10.1080/15348458.2018.1552149
  94. 10.3390/educsci15040461
  95. 10.1080/08824096.2017.1361396
  96. 10.1108/10650741011033035
  97. 10.1007/s11423-016-9446-5
  98. 10.1007/s10639-023-11944-w
  99. 10.1515/jccall-2023-0008
  100. 10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033
  101. 10.1108/IJEM-06-2019-0190
  102. 10.1186/s41239-025-00533-1
  103. 10.62345/jads.2025.14.1.50
  104. 10.1016/j.system.2024.103341
  105. 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.001
  106. How to harness the potential of ChatGPT in education?
    Knowledge Management & E-Learning
  107. 10.1080/10447318.2024.2323277