How Organizations Can Integrate AI-Generated Positive Communication Into Recruitment Efforts for Gen Z Employees

Stephanie A. Smith Virginia Tech ; Michael G. Strawser University of Central Florida

Abstract

This study examines the role of positive communication in AI-generated recruitment messaging and its influence on Generation Z job seekers. Drawing on positive communication scholarship (Mirivel & Fuller, 2024) and the Human Needs Approach (Socha & Beck, 2015), we explore how AI-generated job descriptions shape anticipatory socialization and perceptions of workplace culture. Using qualitative focus groups, we identify key themes related to authenticity, engagement, and the fulfillment of fundamental psychological needs. Findings indicate that although positive communication enhances job attractiveness, job seekers remain skeptical of AI-generated content unless it aligns with real-world workplace values. Organizations must balance AI efficiency with human oversight to maintain trust and ensure transparency in recruitment messaging. This study contributes to business communication research by offering practical and pedagogical implications for AI-integrated hiring strategies and ethical recruitment communication.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906251406942
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (47) · 4 in this index

  1. Aguinis H. Beltran J. Cope A. (2024). How to use generative AI as a human resource management assistant. Orga…
  2. Ayoobzadeh M. Schweitzer L. Lyons S. Ng E. (2024). A tale of two generations: A time-lag study of career expe…
  3. Bailey J. (2008). First steps in qualitative data analysis: Transcribing. Family Practice 25 127–131. https:/…
  4. Braun V. Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2) 77–…
  5. 10.1177/2329488420987277
Show all 47 →
  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Connolly J. (2019). Generational conflict and the sociology of generations: Mannheim and Elias reconsidered. …
  3. Diener E. Thapa S. Tay L. (2020). Positive emotions at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and O…
  4. Earnest D. R. Allen D. G. Landis R. S. (2011). Mechanisms linking realistic job previews with turnover: A met…
  5. Gomez K. Mawhinney T. Betts K. (2019). Welcome to Generation Z. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pag…
  6. Hartman J. (2004). Using focus groups to conduct business communication research. Journal of Business Communi…
  7. Hashmi N. Bal A. S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education and beyond. Business Horizons 67 607–614. https…
  8. Horodyski P. (2023). Applicants’ perception of artificial intelligence in the recruitment process. Computers …
  9. 10.4135/9781412986243.n19
  10. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  11. Lee H. (2023). Gen Z in the workplace: How should companies adapt. Johns Hopkins University. https://imagine.…
  12. 10.1007/s10672-021-09366-2
  13. Lindegaard L. B. (2014). Doing focus group research: Studying rational ordering in focus group interaction. D…
  14. Qualitative communication research methods
  15. The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a gen…
  16. Lunt P. Livingstone S. (1996). Rethinking the focus group in media and communication research. Journal of Com…
  17. Marron M. (2015). New generations require changes beyond the digital. Journalism & Mass Communication Educato…
  18. Men L. Yue C. (2019). Creating a positive emotional culture: Effect of internal communication and impact on e…
  19. Minbaeva D. (2020). Disrupted HR? Human Resource Management Review 31(4) 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hr…
  20. 10.3726/978-1-4539-1383-3
  21. 10.4324/9781315690001-19
  22. Mirivel J. C. Fuller R. P. (2024). A world of possibilities: Introducing positive communication scholarship t…
  23. Owen W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 274–287. h…
  24. Positive communication in health and wellbeing
  25. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  26. Reily P. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on the HR function. Institute for Employee Studies 516…
  27. Robles J. S. Ho E. Y. (2014). Interactional formats and institutional context: A practical and exploitable di…
  28. 10.34257/GJMBRGVOl20IS2PG7
  29. Schroth H. (2019). Are you ready for gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review 61(3) 5–18. https:/…
  30. Socha T. J. Beck G. A. (2015). Positive communication and human needs: A review and proposed organizing conce…
  31. Socha T. J. Blansett-Peters K. Fennell K. Finley C. Gambo F. Grigoreva S. Hall Z. Hunt T. Mack D. J. Madden M…
  32. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  33. 10.4324/9781003150831
  34. Thabrew H. Gega L. (2023). Control alt delete—technology and children’s mental health. Child and Adolescent M…
  35. Generations: The real differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents…
  36. Von Krogh G. (2018). Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theoriz…
  37. Vrontis D. Christofi M. Pereira V. Tarba S. Makrides A. Trichina E. (2020). Artificial intelligence robotics …
  38. Walker D. O. Larson M. (2024). Leveraging generative artificial intelligence (AI) for human resource manageme…
  39. Willett J. F. LaGree D. Shin H. Houston J. Duffy M. (2023). The role of leader communication in fostering res…
  40. Young S. L. Ang M. Campbell K. (2025). Creating a culture of care: What leaders can do to enhance employee en…
  41. Youssef C. M. Luthans F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace. Journal of Management 33(…
  42. Yue C. Men L. Ferguson M. A. (2020). Examining the effects of internal communication and emotional culture on…