Writing Apprehension in the Online Classroom: The Limits of Instructor Behaviors

Jorge Gaytan North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University ; Stephanie Kelly North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University ; Wiley S. Brown North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University

Abstract

In response to COVID-19, educational stakeholders are transferring traditional, face-to-face instruction to the online learning environment. The purpose of this study was to determine if business instructors’ use of immediate behaviors and clarity, which have been found to help business students overcome their writing apprehension in the face-to-face learning environment, can also be used to help business students to overcome their writing apprehension in an online learning environment. Findings indicated that instructor immediate behaviors and clarity are not interventions for writing apprehension in the online learning environment. The instructional strategies business instructors rely on in the face-to-face classroom did not have the same meaning or effect on the online classroom.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2022-12-01
DOI
10.1177/23294906211041088
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

References (56) · 6 in this index

  1. 10.5032/jae.2016.02119
  2. 10.1080/03634520500343368
  3. 10.1177/108056990106400405
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. 10.1109/IE.2014.50
Show all 56 →
  1. 10.1080/03634523.2016.1202994
  2. 10.1080/03634523.2015.1079329
  3. 10.4324/9781315757421
  4. 10.1177/0049124108314720
  5. 10.1080/03634520109379232
  6. Journal of Research in Business Education
  7. Cicco G. (2016). Reflecting on online course evaluations: Five must-do’s for faculty and students (EJ1131813)…
  8. 10.1080/23808985.2020.1792788
  9. 10.1177/107769907705400317
  10. Research in the Teaching of English
  11. 10.1016/j.teln.2017.01.003
  12. Computers and Composition
  13. Fall L. T., Kelly S., Christen S. (2011). Revisiting the impact of instructional immediacy: A differentiation…
  14. 10.5032/jae.2017.04254
  15. 10.15694/mep.2019.000085.1
  16. 10.1080/03634528809378702
  17. Computers and Composition
  18. Iksan H., Abdul Halim H. (2018). The effect of e-feedback via wikis on ESL students’ L2 writing anxiety level…
  19. Iwai Y. (2020, March 13). Online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: What do we gain and what do we lose w…
  20. 10.1111/dsji.12201
  21. Journal of Research in Business Education
  22. 10.1177/109804821101500107
  23. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  24. National Communication Association 96th Annual Convention
  25. 10.1111/ssm.12270
  26. 10.1080/03634523.2015.1014383
  27. 10.1080/08934215.2019.1675737
  28. 10.1515/9781501502446-019
  29. 10.1080/23808985.2020.1792789
  30. 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.015
  31. 10.1177/108056990006300104
  32. Maull F. (2018, January 3). Four vital skills for students entering the business world. Forbes. https://www.f…
  33. 10.1080/23808985.2020.1792793
  34. 10.1080/10510974.2018.1464938
  35. Silent messages: Implicit communication of emptions and attitudes
  36. 10.1080/08824099509362042
  37. Computers and Composition
  38. 10.7330/9781607326021.c004
  39. Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology
  40. Electronic literacies in the workplace: Technologies of writing
  41. 10.18662/rrem/12.1sup2/261
  42. 10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998
  43. 10.1080/03634523.2014.889319
  44. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100761
  45. 10.1007/s10639-020-10181-9
  46. 10.5032/jae.2012.02087
  47. 10.1080/10510974.2018.1466718
  48. 10.1080/03634523.2010.491122
  49. 10.1080/13562517.2017.1332026
  50. 10.1080/036452042000228054
  51. 10.1515/9781501502446-008