Termination Documentation

Abstract

In this study, we examined 11 workplaces to determine how they handle termination documentation, an empirically unexplored area in technical communication and rhetoric. We found that the use of termination documentation is context dependent while following a basic pattern of infraction, investigation, intervention, and termination. Furthermore, the primary audience of the documentation is typically legal and regulatory bodies, not the employee. We also make observations about genre, collaboration, and authorship in these documents.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2014-09-01
DOI
10.1177/2329490614538806
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/1080569912442981
  2. 10.1177/002194369403100403
  3. 10.1177/1080569910376766
  4. 10.1177/1080569912441361
  5. 10.1002/mar.20413
  6. 10.1177/1080569912441823
  7. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.013
  8. 10.1177/1080569907313378
  9. 10.1177/009102609902800105
  10. 10.1177/1080569910376784
  11. 10.1207/s15503461tpmj0802_4
  12. 10.1177/1080569910376788
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511557842
  14. 10.1177/1080569912443081
  15. 10.1177/1080569910376785
  16. 10.1007/s10551-008-9862-5
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →