Abstract

A materialist rhetoric in service learning is needed to teach students how to discover the arguments that already exist in the communities they wish to serve; analyze the effectiveness of those arguments; collaboratively produce viable alternatives with community partners; and assess the impact of their interventions. Through a discussion of a project that attempted but failed to increase parent involvement in Chicago’s public schools, this article shows why rhetorical production needs to be supported by the kind of rhetorical analysis that reveals how institutions exercise power. Materialist rhetoric challenges students, teachers, and community partners to write for social change and define change concretely, in terms of institutional practices or policies that they wish to influence.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2006-06-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20065063
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (11)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
Show all 11 →
  1. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  2. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  6. Literacy in Composition Studies

References (0)

No references on file for this article.