Andy Frazee

4 articles
Georgia Institute of Technology ORCID: 0000-0003-0331-3806

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Frazee

Andy Frazee's work travels primarily in Digital & Multimodal (55% of indexed citations) · 18 total indexed citations from 5 clusters.

By cluster

  • Digital & Multimodal — 10
  • Technical Communication — 4
  • Composition & Writing Studies — 2
  • Other / unclustered — 1
  • Community Literacy — 1

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Configurations and Modalities: Student Preferences about Individual/Collaborative Work and In-Person/Online Work in Linked Courses
    doi:10.1080/10572252.2025.2561651
  2. Getting it Wrong: Student Estimations of Time and the Number of Drafts in Linked Computer Science and Technical Communication Courses
    Abstract

    Background: Students in technical communication classes need to develop expert-like competence in project schedule management to prepare for academic and career success. We address two aspects of project schedule management—estimating time and estimating the number of drafts—that affect undergraduate computer science students in linked computer science–technical communication courses as they prepare documents for their client-based team project. Literature review: Our research considers three areas (developing expert-like behaviors, estimating time, and estimating the number of drafts) that students need to address in their coursework with complex, client-based problems. Research question: What percentage of students accurately estimate, overestimate, or underestimate the time needed to complete project tasks in face-to-face and hybrid sections? We define accurately estimating time as an expert-like behavior and categorize both generating documents and estimating the number of drafts as project tasks. Research methodology: To discuss this research question, we introduce the participants, explain our informed consent, describe our survey instrument for collecting data, and detail our research design. Results/discussion: We present student estimations in two categories: estimated versus actual time to complete assignments and the number of estimated versus actual drafts completed. We learn that students misjudge the amount of time and the number of drafts needed to complete a project, suggesting that technical communication coursework can better prepare students in developing these competencies.

    doi:10.1109/tpc.2024.3477012
  3. State of the Field: Teaching with Digital Tools in the Writing and Communication Classroom
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102511
  4. A Programmatic Ecology of Assessment: Using a Common Rubric to Evaluate Multimodal Processes and Artifacts
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2013.12.005