Computers and Composition Dec 2019

State of the Field: Teaching with Digital Tools in the Writing and Communication Classroom

Joy Robinson University of Alabama in Huntsville ; Lisa Dusenberry Georgia Southern University ; Liz Hutter University of Dayton ; Halcyon Lawrence ; Andy Frazee Georgia Institute of Technology ; Rebecca E. Burnett Georgia Institute of Technology
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2019-12-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102511
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Menagarishvili et al. (2026)
    Configurations and Modalities: Student Preferences about Individual/Collaborati…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Johnson et al. (2024)
    Generosity in computers and writing: Doing what Gail, Halcyon, Johndan, and Bil…
    Computers and Composition
  3. Tham et al. (2023)
    The Great Plains Alliance for Computers and Writing (GPACW): The history of a c…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Johnson et al. (2022)
    Embracing discord? The rhetorical consequences of gaming platforms as classrooms
    Computers and Composition
  5. York (2021)
    Digital surveillance in online writing instruction: Panopticism and simulation …
    Computers and Composition
Show all 9 →
  1. Lutkewitte (2021)
    The Risks and Rewards of Data Creation: A Heuristic for Composition Instructors
    Computers and Composition
  2. Selber (2020)
    Historicizing Infrastructural Contexts for Teaching and Learning: A Heuristic f…
    Computers and Composition
  3. Pâquet (2020)
    Gamified Identification: Gamification and Identification in Indigenous Australi…
    Computers and Composition
  4. O’Dell (2020)
    Modern Marginalia: Using Digital Annotation in the Composition Classroom
    Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (17)

  1. Salisbury (2018)
    Just a Tool: Instructors’ Attitudes and Use of Course Management Systems for On…
    Computers and Composition
  2. Li et al. (2017)
    Online Peer Review Using Turnitin in First-Year Writing Classes
    Computers and Composition
  3. Carpenter et al. (2016)
    Envisioning Future Pedagogies of Multiliteracy Centers
    Computers and Composition
  4. Banks (2015)
    2015 CCCC Chair’s Address: Ain’t No Walls behind the Sky, Baby! Funk, Flight, Freedom
    College Composition and Communication
  5. Amant et al. (2015)
    Online Writing in Global Contexts: Rethinking the Nature of Connections and Com…
    Computers and Composition
Show all 17 →
  1. Dusenberry et al. (2015)
    Filter. Remix. Make.
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. DeVoss et al. (2015)
    Letter from the Guest Editors
    Computers and Composition
  3. Sabatino (2014)
    Improving Writing Literacies through Digital Gaming Literacies: Facebook Gaming…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Hea (2014)
    Social Media in Technical Communication
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Chandler et al. (2012)
    New Literacy Narratives: Stories about Reading and Writing in a Digital Age
    Computers and Composition
  6. Katz et al. (2012)
    Making the Implicit Explicit in Assessing Multimodal Composition: Continuing th…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Lauer (2009)
    Contending with Terms: “Multimodal” and “Multimedia” in the Academic and Public…
    Computers and Composition
  8. Anderson (2008)
    The Low Bridge to High Benefits: Entry-Level Multimedia, Literacies, and Motivation
    Computers and Composition
  9. Kress (2005)
    Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning
    Computers and Composition
  10. Hill et al. (1991)
    Revising on-line: Computer technologies and the revising process
    Computers and Composition
  11. Hawisher et al. (1991)
    The Rhetoric of Technology and the Electronic Writing Class
    College Composition and Communication
  12. Selfe et al. (1983)
    Editorial
    Computers and Composition
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. Browne (2006)
    A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in …
    Interactive Learning Environments  ↗
  2. Chou (2015)
    Prezi versus PowerPoint: The effects of varied digital presentation tools on students’ le…
    Computers & Education  ↗
  3. Kreijns (2013)
    What stimulates teachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? The use of digi…
    Computers in Human Behavior  ↗
  4. Lumpkin (2013)
    Perceptions of teaching effectiveness
    The Educational Forum  ↗
  5. O’Brien (2017)
    Metaliteracy as pedagogical framework for learner-centered design in three MOOC platforms…
    Open Praxis  ↗
  6. Payne (2008)
    Can we talk? Course management software and the construction of knowledge
    On the Horizon  ↗
  7. Reid (2016)
    Multimodal communication in the university: Surveying faculty across disciplines
    Across the Disciplines  ↗
  8. Saklofske (1988)
    Teachers’ efficacy and teaching behaviors
    Psychological Reports  ↗
  9. Vance (2017)
    Video games and multimodality in first-year composition
    CEA Critic  ↗
  10. Vovides (2007)
    The use of e-learning course management systems to support learning strategies and to imp…
    Educational Research Review  ↗
  11. Yinger (1979)
    Routines in teacher planning
    Theory into Practice  ↗
  12. Zhao (2003)
    An ecological analysis of factors affecting technology uses in schools
    American Educational Research Journal  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 31 View in citation network →