Atsuko Kaneko
3 articles-
Discussion Leadership, Empathy, and Psychological Safety: How Communication Shapes Employees’ Adaptive Attitudes ↗
Abstract
Research on psychological safety has expanded rapidly; however, how employees’ communication behaviors shape organizational adjustment remains underexplored. This study examined two dimensions of discussion skills—Discussion Leadership and Empathy—and their associations with psychological safety and adaptive attitudes. A survey of 300 employees in Japan showed a dual-path pattern. Empathy was the strongest predictor of psychological safety, whereas Discussion Leadership was directly associated with adaptive attitudes independent of psychological safety. These findings specify distinct affective and structural communication mechanisms underlying workplace adjustment and highlight Discussion Leadership as a high-impact, learnable skill for fostering engagement, retention, and psychologically safe work environments.
-
Abstract
This study examines how communication channel use explains the effectiveness of workplace team communication through Media Richness Theory and Media Synchronicity Theory. It examines how job characteristics, personal attributes, communication channel usage, and team performance are interrelated in the workplace. The results of an online survey of 400 full-time employees and executives of large Japanese companies show that team communication effectiveness, including the degree of team coordination, inclusion, and performance satisfaction, can be explained through a combination of rich (synchronous) and lean (asynchronous) media use. The implications of using communication channels in the workplace are also discussed.
-
Abstract
Communication apprehension (CA) is widely recognized as a significant inhibitor of communication and performance, making its management crucial. This study explored the connections between gender, managerial status, communication frequency, and discussion skills in explaining CA in the Japanese working population ( N = 300). Our findings suggest that facilitation skills explain CA better than personal attributes or communication frequency and that the gender difference in CA was only observed in nonmanagers. We discuss the implications of our findings for research and education.