This article describes two local research projects and provides a rationale for faculty scholarship at small and community colleges.

This article examines the authors’ arduous struggle to develop a professional communication program that would not only meet their students’ professional and intellectual needs but also achieve an identity consistent with their goals as scholars and teachers of composition. Ultimately, the authors argue that a professional communication program that combines in its teaching the ethos of a liberal arts tradition along with the practical skills needed by writers in the workplace is both desirable and possible but that it must be flexible enough to allow for ongoing curricular and philosophical negotiations to meet changing contextual demands.

Opponents of expressivist writing pedagogy claim that encouraging the personal narrative in first-year rhetoric classis is a great disservice to students. Supporters of personal writing responded by making personal writing activities supplemental to traditional academic writings. Spigelman posits that personal narratives can actually serve the same purpose as academic writing and can accomplish serious scholarly work.

Reviews three books: Time to Know Them: A Longitudinal Study of Writing and Learning at the College Level, by Marilyn S. Sternglass; Feminism and Composition Studies: In Other Words, ed. by Susan C. Jarratt and Lynn Worsham; The Performance of Self in Student Writing, by Thomas Newkirk.

In this paper I want to argue that students’ attitudes about authorship and intellectual property rights are, among other things, evidence of certain cultural "habits of mind," habits which are shaped throughout their lifetimes and which they bring to their interpretations of the writing group experience. (Spigelman 234-35).