Ute Knoch

10 articles
University of Melbourne ORCID: 0000-0002-3306-337X

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Knoch

Ute Knoch's work travels primarily in Composition & Writing Studies (96% of indexed citations) · 62 total indexed citations from 3 clusters.

By cluster

  • Composition & Writing Studies — 60
  • Rhetoric — 1
  • Other / unclustered — 1

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Capturing domain expert perspectives in devising a rating scale for a health specific writing test: How close can we get?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100489
  2. Assessing writing for workplace purposes: Risks, conundrums and compromises
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100484
  3. ‘I will go to my grave fighting for grammar’: Exploring the ability of language-trained raters to implement a professionally-relevant rating scale for writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100488
  4. Examining the validity of an analytic rating scale for a Spanish test for academic purposes using the argument-based approach to validation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2017.12.003
  5. Does the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year of study in an English-medium university?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.001
  6. A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focussed definition for assessment purposes
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.003
  7. Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.003
  8. ‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.002
  9. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.005
  10. Re-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.04.001