Assessing Writing Jan 2007

Re-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training?

Ute Knoch ; John Read ; Janet von Randow
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2007-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2007.04.001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Huang et al. (2022)
    Individualized feedback to raters in language assessment: Impacts on rater effects
    Assessing Writing
  2. Uludag et al. (2022)
    Validating a rubric for assessing integrated writing in an EAP context
    Assessing Writing
  3. Johnson et al. (2017)
    College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author charact…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Wolfe et al. (2016)
    Features of difficult-to-score essays
    Assessing Writing
  5. Winke et al. (2015)
    ESL essay raters’ cognitive processes in applying the Jacobs et al. rubric: An …
    Assessing Writing
Show all 9 →
  1. Esfandiari et al. (2013)
    Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessor…
    Assessing Writing
  2. Rezaei et al. (2010)
    Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing
    Assessing Writing
  3. Whithaus et al. (2008)
    Keyboarding compared with handwriting on a high-stakes writing assessment: Stud…
    Assessing Writing
  4. Knoch (2007)
    ‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two ra…
    Assessing Writing

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. Congdon (2000)
    The stability of rater severity in large-scale assessment programs
    Journal of Educational Measurement  ↗
  2. Elder (2007)
    Evaluating rater responses to an online rater training program
    Language Testing  ↗
  3. Hamilton (2001)
    Teachers’ perceptions of on-line rater training and monitoring
    System  ↗
  4. Jamieson (2005)
    Trend in computer-based second language assessment
    Annual Review of Applied Linguistics  ↗
  5. Lumley (1995)
    Rater characteristics and rater bias: Implications for training
    Language Testing  ↗
  6. Weigle, S. C. (1994a). Effects of training on raters of English as a second language compositions: Quantitati…
     ↗
  7. Weigle (1998)
    Using FACETS to model rater training effects
    Language Testing  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 73 View in citation network →