Computers and Composition

1666 articles
Year: Topic:
Export:

December 2016

  1. Editor List
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30100-1
  2. A Critical Interpretative Synthesis: The Integration of Automated Writing Evaluation into Classroom Writing Instruction
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.05.001
  3. Letter from the Editor
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30104-9
  4. The Internet in “Their” Language: South Korea and the Internationalizing Web
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.08.005
  5. Visualizing Words and Knowledge: Arts of Memory for the Digital Age
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.08.003
  6. Getting Likes, Going Viral, and the Intersections Between Popularity Metrics and Digital Composition
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.08.004
  7. “Are the Instructors Going to Teach Us Anything?”: Conceptualizing Student and Teacher Roles in the “Rhetorical Composing” MOOC
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.08.002
  8. “Devilish Smartphones” and the “Stone-Cold” Internet: Implications of the Technology Addiction Trope in College Student Digital Literacy Narratives
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.08.008
  9. Contents
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30098-6
  10. Book Review
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.08.006
  11. Understanding How Algorithms Work Persuasively Through the Procedural Enthymeme
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.08.007

September 2016

  1. Contents
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30069-x
  2. Envisioning Future Pedagogies of Multiliteracy Centers
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30075-5
  3. Sparty and Selfi: Distributed Intelligence in the Multiliteracy Center
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.006
  4. Adaptive Remediation and the Facilitation of Transfer in Multiliteracy Center Contexts
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.005
  5. Taking stock: Multimodality in writing center users’ texts
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.003
  6. Group consultations: Developing dedicated, technological spaces for collaborative writing and learning
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.004
  7. Multiliteracy Centers Spanning the Digital Divide: Providing a Full Spectrum of Support
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.002
  8. Editor List
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30071-8
  9. Running Lean: Refactoring and the Multiliteracy Center
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.007
  10. Editor Advisory Board
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30072-x

June 2016

  1. Community Enclaves and Public Imaginaries: Formations of Asian American Online Identities
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.012
  2. Messy Problem-Exploring through Video in First-Year Writing: Assessing What Counts
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.001
  3. Letter from the Editor
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30044-5
  4. “Any Time, Any Place”: The Myth of Universal Access and the Semiprivate Space of Online Education
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.002
  5. The Impact of Technology-supported and Triangulated Writing Tasks on a Pilot Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Subject for Construction Disciplines
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.004
  6. Intervention in Online Writing Instruction: An Action-theoretical Perspective
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.010
  7. The Problem of Teaching Presence in Transactional Theories of Distance Education
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.009
  8. Editor Advisory Board
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30041-x
  9. Revisiting Digital Sampling Rhetorics with an Ethics of Care
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.006
  10. A Language of Play: New Media's Possibility Spaces
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.011
  11. Textual Curation
    Abstract

    This article explores textual curation as a conceptualization of authorship and composition within large information structures that is heavily based on the canon of arrangement. This work is often undertaken through distributed collaboration, thus complicating traditional conceptions of authorial attribution and agency. Central curatorial processes include critical recomposition of prior texts along with the development of small and often invisible textual elements such as architecture, metadata, and strategic links. I offer a grounded definition of textual curation that draws from traditional curatorial fields such as Museum Studies and Library Science as well as Writing Studies’ own subfield of Technical Communication, which focuses heavily on recomposed, collaboratively produced texts. Selected Wikipedia articles serve as case studies for examining live curatorial work in open, collaborative environments.

    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.005
  12. Chocolate Frogs for My Betas!: Practicing Literacy at One Online Fanfiction Website
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.001
  13. Messy Methods: Queer Methodological Approaches to Researching Social Media
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.007
  14. Negotiating Community Literacy Practice: Public Memory Work and the Boston Marathon Bombing Digital Archive
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.003
  15. Contents
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30038-x
  16. EFL Reviewers’ Emoticon Use in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Peer Response
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.03.008
  17. Editor List
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30040-8

March 2016

  1. Editor Advisory Board
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30014-7
  2. Editor List
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30013-5
  3. Framing Remix Rhetorically: Toward A Typology of Transformative Work
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.007
  4. Teaching grounded audiences: Burke's identification in Facebook and composition
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.006
  5. Sites of multimodal literacy: Comparing student learning in online and face-to-face environments
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.003
  6. Contents
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30011-1
  7. Audio, Archives, and the Affordance of Listening in a Pedagogy of “Difference”
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.004
  8. Letter from the Editor
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(16)30017-2
  9. Revisualizing Composition: How First-Year Writers Use Composing Technologies
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.001
  10. Weaving Relationship Webs: Tracing how IMing Practices Mediate the Trajectories of Chinese International Students
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.005
  11. Men, women, and Web 2.0 writing: Gender difference in Facebook composing
    doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.002

December 2015

  1. Letter from the Editor
    doi:10.1016/s8755-4615(15)00086-9