Corporate Environmentalism: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Chinese, American, and Italian Corporate Social Responsibility Reports

Danni Yu Beijing Foreign Studies University

Abstract

Background: Environmental reporting is an indispensable part of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) report, which has become a main genre of nonfinancial disclosure for corporations. The present study explores how companies use metaphors to construct their role in the relationship with the environment. Literature review: Previous studies tend to focus on environmental metaphors in genres such as newspapers, blogs, and scientific discourse, but rarely attend to the genre of corporate environmental reporting. Research questions: 1. What metaphors are used by banking and energy companies to represent their role in the relationship with the environment? Are there similarities or differences across cultures? 2. What are their representations in terms of the corporate role, and what impacts do they have on the environment from an ecolinguistic perspective? 3. Why are these metaphors used for environmental communication? Research methodology: The study investigates a corpus of 180 CSR reports published by Chinese, US, and Italian companies with the framework of critical metaphor analysis combined with genre analysis, so as to approach metaphor use from a cross-cultural perspective. Results and conclusions: The study highlights both universal metaphors (manager, protector, and traveler) and culture-specific metaphors (the bee metaphor in Chinese, the steward metaphor in English, and the fighter metaphor in Italian) across three languages, which are used to represent the company's good intentions, caring attitude, and responsible behavior, contributing to building an environmentally responsible corporate image. Some of the metaphors seem useful in inspiring eco-constructive behavior, while others may bear eco-destructive connotations.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2020-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2020.3012728
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Written Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 30 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00201747308601682
  2. 10.1080/17524032.2017.1371052
  3. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705
  4. 10.1080/10926488.2012.665795
  5. 10.1080/17524030903529749
  6. 10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6_9
  7. 10.1080/17524030903522389
  8. 10.1080/17524032.2016.1157506
  9. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1018295
  10. 10.1075/hcp.38.16tri
  11. 10.1177/1350508406068506
  12. 10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon
  13. 10.1177/2329488418784690
  14. 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003
  15. 10.1016/S1479-3598(06)03001-9
  16. 10.1075/celcr.14
  17. 10.4324/9781315718071
    Ecolinguistics Language Ecology and the Stories We Live By  
  18. 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
  19. 10.2307/j.ctt5vm557
    Metaphors for Environmental Sustainability Redefining Our Relationship with Nature  
  20. 10.2307/3588189
  21. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3
  22. 10.1002/csr.132
  23. 10.4067/S0718-09342013000300002
  24. 10.1108/13632541211217605
  25. 10.4324/9781315442044
  26. 10.1080/17405904.2013.845789
  27. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
  28. Cross-cultural and intercultural communication and discourse analysis
    The Handbook of Discourse Analysis  
  29. 10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1
  30. 10.1057/9780230000612