Resolving Discourse at Technical-Support Helpdesks

Vincent D. Robles University of North Texas

Abstract

Background: This study examined discourse during the problem resolution process in face-to-face technical-support interactions between technical-support providers and users at a helpdesk. Specifically, this study responds to the limited discourse-based research in technical-support interactions, despite the agreement that exploring communication within these interactions can help to improve them. Literature review: Research in technical communication has only begun to systematically explore the microlevel (smaller, moment-to-moment) communication in these interactions, though it has provided a well-established understanding of their macrolevel (genre) structure. Further, research has not completely explored how the two participants in the interaction work discursively to resolve technical problems and what strategies appear to promote user satisfaction. Research questions: 1. What microlevel discourse do technical-support providers employ to resolve technical problems? 2. What microlevel discourse do users employ when collaborating with technical-support providers to resolve technical problems? 3. What microlevel discourse from both technical-support providers and users appears in satisfactory interactions? 4. What exchange patterns between the two participants appear in satisfactory interactions? Methodology: Using speech-act discourse analysis, this study examined 17 helpdesk interactions that resolved problems. These interactions occurred at a large, Midwestern US university helpdesk at which 11 instructors sought help with instructional technologies. Using a post-session survey completed by the users, I compared interactions with above- and below-average levels of user satisfaction to determine which microlevel discourse promoted user satisfaction with the help experience. Results: Technical-support providers employed signals announcing their thoughts and actions, gave explanations of the technology, and communicated confirmations or denials to user questions. Users employed inquiries about the technology, gave background information, and communicated confirmations or denials to technical-support provider questions. Statistically significant results about both speakers’ discourse indicate that typical instructional strategies (such as explanations) do not necessarily characterize more satisfactory interactions. Instead, alternate forms of instruction (minimal responses or giving background information from personal experience) contribute toward satisfactory outcomes. Also, users’ facility in asking follow-up questions or in giving further background information even during the problem-resolution stage appears to promote satisfaction. Further, a closer examination of the exchanges reveals how both participants interact in these ways. Conclusions: This study provides further insight into the typical instructional strategies identified by other researchers. Specifically, although explanations or directions do characterize problem resolution, these discourse strategies do not necessarily characterize distinctly satisfactory problem resolution. As one of the only studies of the functional discourse within technical-support interactions, this study provides researchers and practitioners further insight into how these important interactions work when technical-support providers resolve problems.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2018-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2018.2813178
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (39) · 7 in this index

  1. 10.4135/9781071802878
    The Content Analysis Guidebook  
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
  4. 10.5040/9781350934290
    Discourse Analysis An Introduction  
  5. 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020377
Show all 39 →
  1. Not that button but the other: Misunderstanding and non-understanding in helpdesk encount…
    Tech Commun
  2. Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts
    J Artif Intell Educ
  3. Talk About Writing The Tutoring Strategies of Experienced Writing Center Tutors
  4. Quantitative Research Methods for Communication A Hands-On Approach
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511805226
  6. 10.1111/1467-6486.00290
  7. 10.1108/09604520210434857
  8. 10.1207/s15327043hup1101_1
  9. 10.1080/08959285.1998.9668029
  10. 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.416.14419
  11. 10.2307/2393471
  12. 10.1080/095851900422375
  13. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199812)15:8<793::AID-MAR5>3.0.CO;2-0
  14. 10.1108/09564230010323642
  15. 10.1177/0092070304269111
  16. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  17. Technical Communication Quarterly
  18. 10.1109/IPCC.2007.4464071
  19. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  20. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  21. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  22. Technical Communication Quarterly
  23. 10.1109/IPCC.1993.593762
  24. 10.2307/2393937
  25. The golden age of technical communication
    J Tech Writing Commun
  26. Learning at work: The role of technical communication in organizational learning
    Tech Commun
  27. What's technical about technical writing?
    Central Works in Technical Communication
  28. 10.1002/mar.20756
  29. 10.1002/mar.20711
  30. 10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90014-2
  31. 10.1016/j.knosys.2010.09.005
  32. The social help desk: Examining how twitter is used as a technical support tool
    Commun Quart
  33. 10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245484
  34. 10.1075/pbns.143.05bak