Insider Audiences and Plain-Language Revision: A City Charter Case Study

Kira Dreher Montclair State University

Abstract

Background: In policy and law contexts, plain-language practice and research tend to focus on the benefits of plain language for specific nonexpert or public audiences. However, as plain-language use has proliferated, documents targeted for revision increasingly include those with insider and expert primary audiences. This study investigates the effects of plain-language revision on insider audiences following the adoption of a revised city charter in a Midwestern US city. Research questions: 1. How does plain-language revision affect the way that insider city-government users make sense of the city charter? 2. How does plain-language revision affect the way that insider city-government users act on the city charter? Literature review: Plain language-a strategy that writers use to make texts more effective for users-is historically and ideologically associated with helping public or vulnerable audiences to access complex information. This core priority toward public or nonexpert audiences is important; however, it has also resulted in a limited understanding of the full scope of plain-language audiences, especially in contexts where insider and expert audiences are primary users. Methodology: This study, informed by genre theory, is a qualitative case study in which textual artifacts and interview data were collected and analyzed using a two-cycle qualitative coding process. Results: The analysis showed many effects, nearly all positive, for insiders and experts. Conclusions: This article focuses on two areas of impact: charter authority and user practices. I explore these areas, which include improved navigation, organization, and processes, through the concept of interplay between the unrevised and revised charters.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2017-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2017.2759578
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00549.x
  3. 10.2307/375964
  4. 10.2190/FBC
  5. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries
    Educ Commun Technol J  
  6. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  7. Investigating texts in their social contexts: The promise and peril of rhetorical genre studies
    Writing in Knowledge Societies  
  8. 10.1109/IPCC.2009.5208680
  9. 10.4324/9781315796956
    Plain Language and Ethical Action A Dialogic Approach to Technical Content in the 21st Century  
  10. 10.7208/chicago/9780226284200.001.0001