Abstract

This paper studies the language of job descriptions in rhetoric and technical and professional communication to explore how this language might be exclusionary of international scholars. Through critical discourse analysis, we reviewed current U.S. labor and immigration laws and contrasted those laws with the language of hiring documents. We found that hiring documents do not always align with U.S. labor and immigration laws and consequently hinder the hiring prospects of international scholars.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2021-04-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2020.1829072
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College English
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117
  2. 10.1109/TPC.2016.2592578
  3. 10.1109/TPC.2017.2759578
  4. 10.1177/0957926592003002004
  5. 10.4324/9780203809068.ch1
  6. 10.1177/001088049003100127
  7. 10.1109/TPC.2017.2762964
  8. 10.2307/378062
  9. 10.1109/TPC.1987.6449073
  10. 10.17763/1943-5045-87.4.557
  11. 10.1109/TPC.2011.2170912
  12. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744763.001.0001
  13. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1427120
  14. 10.7330/9781607326649.c001
  15. 10.4324/9781315796956
  16. 10.2190/CPIC1
  17. 10.1002/9781118504871
CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network →