Abstract

This paper studies the language of job descriptions in rhetoric and technical and professional communication to explore how this language might be exclusionary of international scholars. Through critical discourse analysis, we reviewed current U.S. labor and immigration laws and contrasted those laws with the language of hiring documents. We found that hiring documents do not always align with U.S. labor and immigration laws and consequently hinder the hiring prospects of international scholars.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2021-04-03
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2020.1829072
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (12)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 12 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  4. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  5. Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric
  6. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  7. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (43) · 12 in this index

  1. 10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Show all 43 →
  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.).National origin discrimination. Retrieved from https://www.ee…
  2. Language and power
  3. 10.1177/0957926592003002004
  4. 10.4324/9780203809068.ch1
  5. An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education
  6. Garland, C. (2014, November 7).Being foreign on the U.S. academic market [blog post]. HigherEdJobs. Retrieved…
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. 10.1177/001088049003100127
  9. Herget, A. (2016, August, 18).Foreign-born faculty face challenges [blog post]. HigherEdJobs. Retrieved from …
  10. Computers and Composition
  11. Programmatic Perspectives
  12. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  13. Technical Communication
  14. 10.2307/378062
  15. Writing for dollars, writing to please: The case for plain language in business, governme…
  16. Analyzing prose
  17. Programmatic Perspectives
  18. College English
  19. Technical Writing: Theory and Practice
  20. OPT Policy Guidance. (2010).Student and exchange visitor program. Retrieved from https://www.ice.gov/doclib/s…
  21. Technical Communication Quarterly
  22. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  23. President’s Report to the Board of Trustees. (February 7, 2019).DEI initiatives. Retrieved from https://www.o…
  24. Methods of critical discourse studies
  25. Posthuman praxis in technical communication
  26. College Composition and Communication
  27. 40th Annual symposium article
  28. 10.17763/1943-5045-87.4.557
  29. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  30. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744763.001.0001
  31. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (US DHS). (2018).E-Verify. Retrieved from https://www.e-verify.gov/emplo…
  32. U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (US DOL). (2008).Fact Sheet #62J: What does “place of employm…
  33. 10.1080/17405904.2018.1427120
  34. 10.7330/9781607326649.c001
  35. 10.4324/9781315796956
  36. From black codes to recodification: Removing the veil from regulatory writing
  37. 10.2190/CPIC1
  38. 10.1002/9781118504871