Abstract

Before a jury begins deliberation, judges provide instructions to guide jury decision-making. Unfortunately, extant literature has demonstrated poor comprehension of these instructions. Although there have been attempts to simplify the language of these instructions, plain language may not be enough to ensure comprehension. Instead, the principles of technical communication advocate the adoption of a learner-centered perspective and suggest increased novice–expert interactions to assist jurors in comprehending the task assigned to them.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2010-12-22
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2011.528345
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1002/acp.1036
  2. 10.2307/1121842
  3. 10.2307/1144109
  4. 10.2307/3594252
  5. 10.1037/0003-066X.48.4.423
  6. 10.2307/1191911
  7. 10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.381
  8. Inside the jury
  9. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation
  10. 10.3758/BF03197287
  11. 10.1177/0011128706294681
  12. 10.1007/BF01044622
  13. 10.2307/1143210
  14. 10.2307/3053535
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.857
  16. 10.1023/A:1020977400474
  17. 10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.455
  18. 10.2307/357883
  19. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 1972
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →