Media Naturalness and Compensatory Adaptation: Counterintuitive Effects on Correct Rejections of Deceitful Contract Clauses

Ned Kock Texas A&M International University ; Jesus Carmona Texas A&M University – Kingsville ; Murad Moqbel University of Kansas Medical Center

Abstract

Research problem: Deciding whether to accept or reject contract clauses in software purchasing contracts is a complex communication-related task, which is likely faced daily by a multitude of software purchasing professionals in a variety of organizations. Research question: What are the effects of viewing contract clauses as video clips, compared to viewing clauses as text only, in terms of cognitive effort, communication ambiguity, and correctness in the acceptance or rejection of clauses in software purchasing contracts? Literature review: The literature on the Media Richness and Media Naturalness theories suggest that viewing contract clauses as video clips should reduce cognitive effort and communication ambiguity. However, while Media Richness theory suggests that correctness in the acceptance or rejection of clauses in software purchasing contracts should increase with the use of video clips, Media Naturalness theory suggests a neutral overall effect. Methodology: An experiment was conducted in which student participants were asked to either accept or reject 20 clauses from a software contract, placing themselves in the position of buyers. Of the 20 clauses, 6 were intentionally deceitful and potentially harmful to the buyer. Approximately half of the participants reviewed the contract clauses as web-based text, and the remaining as web-based video clips. Results and conclusions: Viewing contract clauses as video clips was associated with significantly less cognitive effort and less communication ambiguity than viewing the clauses as text only. Counterintuitively, increases in perceived cognitive effort and communication ambiguity were associated with more successful identification and rejection of deceitful contract clauses. The combination of these competing effects led to an overall neutral effect of the medium on the correctness in the acceptance or rejection of clauses. These findings are consistent with expectations based on Media Naturalness theory, particularly its compensatory adaptation proposition, and inconsistent with expectations based on Media Richness theory.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2015-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2016.2519318
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 40 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/03637759909376468
  2. 10.3758/BF03206553
  3. 10.4018/jec.2005010101
  4. 10.4018/ijec.2014010101
  5. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00049.x
  6. 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00144.x
  7. 10.1287/orsc.5.4.502
  8. 10.2307/257090
  9. 10.2307/248682
  10. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  11. Information systems theorizing based on evolutionary psychology: An interdisciplinary rev…
    MIS Quart  
  12. 10.1287/isre.5.2.110
  13. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000612
  14. 10.1108/13287260180000758
  15. 10.1007/s10726-006-9044-8
  16. 10.1287/isre.9.3.256
  17. 10.1037/10694-000
  18. 10.1007/BF02299088
  19. 10.2307/1170217
  20. Media, tasks, communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity
    MIS Quart  
  21. 10.1080/02681102.2013.832129
  22. 10.2307/3151312
  23. 10.1287/isre.1070.0166
  24. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000284
  25. 10.1002/jcaf.10080
  26. 10.1177/104649649903000402
  27. 10.1177/1046496498296003
  28. 10.1287/isre.4.3.207
  29. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0071
  30. 10.1057/ejis.2010.49
  31. 10.1016/j.dss.2007.03.011
  32. 10.5465/AME.1988.4277259
  33. 10.1080/1360086032000125021
  34. 10.1016/S0267-3649(03)00409-6
  35. 10.1287/isre.1080.0223
  36. 10.4018/joeuc.2000040104
  37. 10.2307/3250931
  38. 10.1109/5254.846283
  39. 10.1093/mnras/225.1.155
  40. 10.1038/scientificamerican0583-116