Unintended Consequences of Electronic Monitoring of Instant Messaging

Carolyn F. Holton Southeastern University ; Robert M. Fuller University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Abstract

Legislative requirements like those in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have sharply increased the incidence of monitoring of electronic communications, but the consequences of this trend are little understood. This study examines the impact of organizational monitoring of sensitive instant message (IM) discussions with a designed experiment. When their IMs are known to be monitored, individuals are found to sharply curtail their discussion of personally incriminating information and to increase their spontaneous denials of knowledge of sensitive topics. Surprisingly, perhaps, they also increase their discussion of relayed information that may incriminate others or the organization. Qualitative analysis suggests that people are not aware they make these adjustments to their IM communication content when monitored. Given the legislative compliance motivations for some of the monitoring activity in companies, it is ironic that study findings suggest organizations may communicate less firsthand information about potentially curtailable legal liabilities and other sensitive incidents requiring corrective action when communication is monitored. Organizations enacting monitoring of IM should pay heed to the requirements as well as the discretion available to them within those requirements to enact monitoring in a way that suits their organizational goals.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2008-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2008.2007866
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 27 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1023/A:1006223027879
  2. 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00897.x
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.257
  4. 10.1108/13639510510581039
  5. 10.2139/ssrn.364600
  6. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  7. 10.1145/6424.6430
  8. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.867
  9. 10.1145/45945.214325
  10. 10.1287/orsc.5.4.502
  11. 10.1177/009365098025006006
  12. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  13. 10.5465/AME.1998.1109047
  14. 10.1016/0378-8733(90)90021-Z
  15. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  16. 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
  17. 10.1177/0893318990004002002
  18. 10.1145/196734.196738
  19. 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90050-6
  20. 10.1177/009365096023001001
  21. 10.2307/249762
  22. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01100.x
  23. 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1995.tb01157.x
  24. 10.1002/mar.4220050204
  25. 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
  26. 10.1177/017084069301400103
  27. 10.1037/0022-006X.46.6.1549