IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2006

The Functions of Formulaic and Nonformulaic Compliments in Interactions About Technical Writing

J. Mackiewicz

Abstract

Writing tutors are encouraged to use compliments in their interactions with technical writing students. However, the form of compliments strongly influences how they function. Specifically, formulaic compliments like "It's good" function differently from nonformulaic compliments like "The size is excellent in terms of visually aiding the reader." A total of 107 compliments were analyzed from 13 interactions between 12 writing tutors and 12 engineering students. About 61% of tutors' compliments followed one of six formulae, and about 39% were nonformulaic. Formulaic compliments were general and mainly performed a phatic function, filling pauses and avoiding silence, particularly in interaction closings. Nonformulaic compliments were more specific and individualized, and they may, therefore, be more instructive than formulaic compliments. Nonformulaic compliments also performed an exploratory function, allowing participants to renegotiate discourse status. This study points to other avenues of research, particularly research that systemically examines writers' perceptions of formulaic and nonformulaic feedback, such as compliments.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2006-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2006.870461
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
discourse analysis peer tutoring technical communication
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Porter (2017)
    Professional Communication as Phatic: From Classical Eunoia to Personal Artific…
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  2. Mackiewicz (2014)
    Motivating Quality: The Impact of Amateur Editors’ Suggestions on User-Generate…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Mackiewicz (2011)
    Epinions Advisors as Technical Editors: Using Politeness Across Levels of Edit
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Thompson (2009)
    Scaffolding in the Writing Center: A Microanalysis of an Experienced Tutor’s Ve…
    Written Communication
  5. MacKiewicz (2008)
    Comparing Powerpoint Experts' and University Students' Opinions about Powerpoin…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (53) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     ↗
  2. 10.1515/9783110809145.115
     ↗
  3. Tannen (1993)
    The relativity of linguistic strategies
  4. 10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4
     ↗
  5. 10.1016/j.langcom.2004.02.003
     ↗
Show all 53 →
  1. 10.1163/9789004653559_018
     ↗
  2. Butler (1997)
    Repeated word combinations in spoken and written text: Some implications for functional grammar
  3. Moon (1998)
    Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
     ↗
  5. Botelho da Silva (1993)
    Ill-formedness and transformability in Portuguese idioms
  6. 10.1207/s15327868ms0203_1
     ↗
  7. 10.1017/S1355617701744086
     ↗
  8. Van Lancker (2001)
    Is your syntactic component really necessary?
    Aphasiology
  9. 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00063-6
     ↗
  10. 10.1515/9783110809145.1
     ↗
  11. 10.1080/00437956.1961.11659754
     ↗
  12. 10.1515/9783110809145.289
     ↗
  13. 10.1093/applin/21.1.26
     ↗
  14. Halliday (1978)
    Language as Social Semiotic
  15. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<235::AID-JOB9>3.0.CO;2-N
     ↗
  16. Locker (1999)
    Factors in Reader Responses to Negative Letters: Experimental Evidence for Chan…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  17. 10.1177/0893318988002001006
     ↗
  18. JABLIN et al. (1984)
    Characteristics of Rejection Letters and their Effects on Job Applicants
    Written Communication
  19. 10.1177/002194368802500103
     ↗
  20. 10.2307/378429
     ↗
  21. 10.1016/0378-2166(88)90005-7
     ↗
  22. 10.1017/S0047404500014378
     ↗
  23. Hernandez Herrero (1999)
    Analysis and comparison of complimenting behavior in Costa Rican Spanish and American English
    Kanina
  24. 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1995.tb00073.x
     ↗
  25. Agar (1985)
    Institutional discourse
    Text
  26. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00603.x
     ↗
  27. Mancuso (1992)
    Technical Editing
  28. Putnam (1985)
    Myths about editing
    Tech. Commun.
  29. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1204-1
     ↗
  30. Mackiewicz (2003)
    The technical editor as diplomat: Linguistic strategies for balancing clarity and politeness
    Tech. Commun.
  31. Harris (2004)
    SLATE Statement: The Concept of a Writing Center
  32. Wingate (2000)
    What line? I didn’t see any line
  33. Wilcox (1994)
    Conferencing tips
    Writing Lab Newsletter
  34. Brooks (1991)
    Minimalist tutoring: Making the student do all the work
    Writing Lab Newsletter
  35. Hurlow
    Experts with life, novices with writing
  36. Mackiewicz (2004)
    The Effects of Tutor Expertise in Engineering Writing: A Linguistic Analysis of…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  37. 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
     ↗
  38. 10.1093/applin/24.1.90
     ↗
  39. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5
     ↗
  40. 10.1515/text.1.1999.19.2.253
     ↗
  41. Nattinger (1992)
    Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching
  42. Walker et al. (1987)
    Writing Conference Talk: Factors Associated with High- and Low-Rated Writing Co…
    Research in the Teaching of English
  43. Boxer (1993)
    Complaining and Commiserating: A Speech Act View of Solidarity in Spoken American English
  44. 10.1515/9783110219289.2.217
     ↗
  45. Tannen (1990)
    You Just Don’t Understand
  46. 10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0
     ↗
  47. 10.1177/108056999706000204
     ↗
  48. 10.2307/377047
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2025
    UX Research, Management, and Design: What a Textual Analysis of UX Job Ads Means for Technical Communication ↗
    Guiseppe Getto; Bremen Vance
    discourse analysis technical communication professional writing
  3. The Peer Review Sep 2025
    The Writing Center as a Rebel Space: Stories of Tutoring and Writing with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ↗
    Ghada Seifeddine
    discourse analysis teacher development writing centers peer tutoring empirical research multimodality literacy studies race and writing disability studies editorial matter
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2025
    Presenting and Making Relevant: Analyzing Teaching Assistant Perceptions of Writing in Statistics Using Semantic Frames ↗
    Ben Markey
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis graduate education teacher development assessment technical communication professional writing
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly Apr 2025
    Communicating Global Governmentality: The United Nations Global Compact, BP, and the Implicit Violence of Human Rights Discourse ↗
    Michael T. MacDonald
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis technical communication qualitative research