Abstract

Writing tutors are encouraged to use compliments in their interactions with technical writing students. However, the form of compliments strongly influences how they function. Specifically, formulaic compliments like "It's good" function differently from nonformulaic compliments like "The size is excellent in terms of visually aiding the reader." A total of 107 compliments were analyzed from 13 interactions between 12 writing tutors and 12 engineering students. About 61% of tutors' compliments followed one of six formulae, and about 39% were nonformulaic. Formulaic compliments were general and mainly performed a phatic function, filling pauses and avoiding silence, particularly in interaction closings. Nonformulaic compliments were more specific and individualized, and they may, therefore, be more instructive than formulaic compliments. Nonformulaic compliments also performed an exploratory function, allowing participants to renegotiate discourse status. This study points to other avenues of research, particularly research that systemically examines writers' perceptions of formulaic and nonformulaic feedback, such as compliments.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2006-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2006.870461
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Written Communication
Also cites 30 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  2. 10.1515/9783110809145.115
  3. 10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4
  4. 10.1016/j.langcom.2004.02.003
  5. 10.1163/9789004653559_018
  6. 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
  7. 10.1207/s15327868ms0203_1
  8. 10.1017/S1355617701744086
  9. 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00063-6
  10. 10.1515/9783110809145.1
  11. 10.1080/00437956.1961.11659754
  12. 10.1515/9783110809145.289
  13. 10.1093/applin/21.1.26
  14. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<235::AID-JOB9>3.0.CO;2-N
  15. 10.1177/0893318988002001006
  16. 10.1177/002194368802500103
  17. 10.2307/378429
  18. 10.1016/0378-2166(88)90005-7
  19. 10.1017/S0047404500014378
  20. 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1995.tb00073.x
  21. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00603.x
  22. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1204-1
  23. 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
  24. 10.1093/applin/24.1.90
  25. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2601_5
  26. 10.1515/text.1.1999.19.2.253
  27. 10.1515/9783110219289.2.217
  28. 10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50010-0
  29. 10.1177/108056999706000204
  30. 10.2307/377047