Abstract

This study examined adolescents’ perspectives on their multimodal composing goals and designs when creating digital projects in the context of an English Language Arts class. Sociocultural and social semiotics theoretical frameworks were integrated to understand six 12th grade students’ viewpoints when composing three multimodal products—a website, hypertext literary analysis, and podcast—in response to a well-known literary text. Data sources included screen capture and video observations, design interviews, written reflections, and multimodal products. Findings revealed how adolescents concurrently composed for multiple purposes and audiences during the literature analysis unit. In particular, students viewed projects as a platform to emotionally affect and entertain a broader audience, as well as a conduit through which they could represent themselves as composers. Emphasis was placed on creating cohesive compositions—ranging from close modal matching to building meaning at a thematic level and creating a multisensory experience indicative of the novel’s narrative world. These findings contribute a multidimensional understanding of adolescents’ various and interacting multimodal composing goals and have implications for leveraging modal affordances in the classroom.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2018-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088317752335
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
  5. Written Communication
Show all 13 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Written Communication
  5. Research in the Teaching of English
  6. Written Communication
  7. Written Communication
  8. Written Communication
Also cites 29 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1598/JAAL.52.7.4
  2. 10.1598/JAAL.52.1.2
  3. “It makes it more real”: Teaching new literacies in a secondary English classroom
    English Education  
  4. 10.1002/tesq.241
  5. 10.1002/TRTR.01129
  6. 10.1086/681969
  7. 10.58680/ee20076425
  8. 10.1177/1470357210390441
  9. 10.1177/016146811011200903
  10. 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.003
  11. 10.58680/ee201011557
  12. 10.3102/0091732X07310586
  13. 10.1177/1086296X12468587
  14. 10.1177/1086296X16658982
  15. 10.1080/00461520.2010.493470
  16. 10.1598/JAAL.54.1.4
  17. 10.1177/016146810010200306
  18. 10.17763/haer.78.1.54468j6204x24157
  19. 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
  20. 10.1080/15235882.2015.1091051
  21. 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00664.x
  22. 10.1598/RRQ.42.3.3
  23. 10.1002/rrq.153
  24. 10.4018/978-1-4666-4345-1.ch001
  25. 10.1080/17439884.2016.1182924
  26. 10.1002/jaal.503
  27. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.001
  28. 10.1177/1086296X13504155
  29. 10.1177/1468798417712573
CrossRef global citation count: 59 View in citation network →